Findings of District Commission
Commencement. 24th July, 2020.-- S. 2 clauses (4), (13), (14), (16), (40), s. 10 to 27 (both inclusive), sub-clause (iv) of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 58, s. 88, 89, 92 and 93, 94, 96, 97 and 99, clause (f) to (m) of sub-section 2 and clauses (zg), (zh) and (zi) of sub-section 2 of s. 101, 104, vide notification No. S.O. 2421(E), dated 23rd July 2020, see Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, sec. 3(ii).
Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 deals with findings of District Commission. Where the District Commission is satisfied that the goods complained against suffer from any of the defects specified in the complaint or that any of the allegations contained in the complaint about the services or any unfair trade practices, or claims for compensation under product liability are pr The Act was enacted on 09 Aug 2019.
(1) Where the District Commission is satisfied that the goods complained against suffer from any of the defects specified in the complaint or that any of the allegations contained in the complaint about the services or any unfair trade practices, or claims for compensation under product liability are proved, it shall issue an order to the opposite party directing him to do one or more of the following, namely:--
(a) to remove the defect pointed out by the appropriate laboratory from the goods in question;
(b) to replace the goods with new goods of similar description which shall be free from any defect;
(c) to return to the complainant the price, or, as the case may be, the charges paid by the complainant along with such interest on such price or charges as may be decided;
(d) to pay such amount as may be awarded by it as compensation to the consumer for any loss or injury suffered by the consumer due to the negligence of the opposite party:
Provided that the District Commission shall have the power to grant punitive damages in such circumstances as it deems fit;
(e) to pay such amount as may be awarded by it as compensation in a product liability action under Chapter VI;
(f) to remove the defects in goods or deficiencies in the services in question;
(g) to discontinue the unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice and not to repeat them;
(h) not to offer the hazardous or unsafe goods for sale;
(i) to withdraw the hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
(j) to cease manufacture of hazardous goods and to desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
(k) to pay such sum as may be determined by it, if it is of the opinion that loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently:
Provided that the minimum amount of sum so payable shall not be less than twenty-five per cent. of the value of such defective goods sold or service provided, as the case may be, to such consumers;
(l) to issue corrective advertisement to neutralise the effect of misleading advertisement at the cost of the opposite party responsible for issuing such misleading advertisement;
(m) to provide for adequate costs to parties; and
(n) to cease and desist from issuing any misleading advertisement.
(2) Any amount obtained under sub-section (1) shall be credited to such fund and utilised in such manner as may be prescribed.
(3) In any proceeding conducted by the President and a member and if they differ on any point or points, they shall state the point or points on which they differ and refer the same to another member for hearing on such point or points and the opinion of the majority shall be the order of the District Commission:
Provided that the other member shall give his opinion on such point or points referred to him within a period of one month from the date of such reference.
(4) Every order made by the District Commission under sub-section (1) shall be signed by the President and the member who conducted the proceeding:
Provided that where the order is made as per majority opinion under sub-section (3), such order shall also be signed by the other member.
Section 39, The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (Act 35 of 2019).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Eastern Condiments Private Limited & Ors. v. Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Upabhokthru Samithi & Ors.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
District Commission power to order withdrawal/recall of hazardous or defective goods flows from CPA 2019 s.39(1)(g)–(j), but that power is conditioned on satisfaction after hearing; an ex parte interim recall relying on contradictory lab material without the s.38(2)(g) hearing opportunity is unsustainable, even though an appeal under s.41 ordinarily lies.
On this section: s.39 findings/relief powers (including withdrawal of goods) were the Commission’s asserted source of the recall order; HC reads s.39 with the hearing precondition before enforcing such findings.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Made under this section, and citing it
1 instrument names this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
Questions about Section 39
What have the courts held on Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act?
Eastern Condiments Private Limited & Ors. v. Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Upabhokthru Samithi & Ors. (23 Mar 2023) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.39 findings/relief powers (including withdrawal of goods) were the Commission’s asserted source of the recall order; HC reads s.39 with the hearing precondition before enforcing such findings.
How do I find court cases under Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Consumer Protection Act 39, section 39 Consumer Protection Act, section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act. People searching for it also type consumer protection act 2019 section 39. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Eastern Condiments Private Limited & Ors. v. Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Upabhokthru Samithi & Ors. (23 Mar 2023).
What should I read with Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act, and has it changed?
4 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. One instrument names it without being made under it, most recently Rajasthan Consumer Protection Rules, 2021. (2021).
When was Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act enacted?
Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act, cited as Consumer Protection Act 39, was enacted on 09 Aug 2019 as Act 35 of 2019. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions3979 words
- 38. Procedure on admission of complaint1381 words
- 101. Power of Central Government to make rules916 words
- 102. Power of State Government to make rules517 words
- 47. Jurisdiction of State Commission493 words
- 21. Power of Central Authority to issue directions and penalties against false or misleading advertisements469 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.