Section217
The Companies Act, 2013

Procedure, powers, etc., of inspectors

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 1 provision Instruments 1

Section 217 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with procedure, powers, etc., of inspectors. It shall be the duty of all officers and other employees and agents including the former officers, employees and agents of a company which is under investigation in accordance with the provisions contained in this Chapter, and where the affairs of any other body corporate or a person are investigate The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) It shall be the duty of all officers and other employees and agents including the former officers, employees and agents of a company which is under investigation in accordance with the provisions contained in this Chapter, and where the affairs of any other body corporate or a person are investigated under section 219, of all officers and other employees and agents including former officers, employees and agents of such body corporate or a person--

(a) to preserve and to produce to an inspector or any person authorised by him in this behalf all books and papers of, or relating to, the company or, as the case may be, relating to the other body corporate or the person, which are in their custody or power; and

(b) otherwise to give to the inspector all assistance in connection with the investigation which they are reasonably able to give.

(2) The inspector may require any body corporate, other than a body corporate referred to in subsection (1), to furnish such information to, or produce such books and papers before him or any person authorised by him in this behalf as he may consider necessary, if the furnishing of such information or the production of such books and papers is relevant or necessary for the purposes of his investigation.

(3) The inspector shall not keep in his custody any books and papers produced under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) for more than one hundred and eighty days and return the same to the company, body corporate, firm or individual by whom or on whose behalf the books and papers were produced:

Provided that the books and papers may be called for by the inspector if they are needed again for a further period of one hundred and eighty days by an order in writing.

(4) An inspector may examine on oath--

(a) any of the persons referred to in sub-section (1); and

(b) with the prior approval of the Central Government, any other person,

in relation to the affairs of the company, or other body corporate or person, as the case may be, and for that purpose may require any of those persons to appear before him personally:

Provided that in case of an investigation under section 212, the prior approval of Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office shall be sufficient under clause (b).

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any contract to the contrary, the inspector, being an officer of the Central Government, making an investigation under this Chapter shall have all the powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:--

(a) the discovery and production of books of account and other documents, at such place and time as may be specified by such person;

(b) summoning and enforcing the attendance of persons and examining them on oath; and

(c) inspection of any books, registers and other documents of the company at any place.

(6) (i) If any director or officer of the company disobeys the direction issued by the Registrar or the inspector under this section, the director or the officer shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year and with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees.

(ii) If a director or an officer of the company has been convicted of an offence under this section, the director or the officer shall, on and from the date on which he is so convicted, be deemed to have vacated his office as such and on such vacation of office, shall be disqualified from holding an office in any company.

(7) The notes of any examination under sub-section (4) shall be taken down in writing and shall be read over to, or by, and signed by, the person examined, and may thereafter be used in evidence against him.

(8) If any person fails without reasonable cause or refuses--

(a) to produce to an inspector or any person authorised by him in this behalf any book or paper which is his duty under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) to produce;

(b) to furnish any information which is his duty under sub-section (2) to furnish;

(c) to appear before the inspector personally when required to do so under subsection (4) or to answer any question which is put to him by the inspector in pursuance of that sub-section; or

(d) to sign the notes of any examination referred to in sub-section (7),

he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months and with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees, and also with a further fine which may extend to two thousand rupees for every day after the first during which the failure or refusal continues.

(9) The officers of the Central Government, State Government, police or statutory authority shall provide assistance to the inspector for the purpose of inspection, inquiry or investigation, which the

inspector may, with the prior approval of the Central Government, require.

(10) The Central Government may enter into an agreement with the Government of a foreign State for reciprocal arrangements to assist in any inspection, inquiry or investigation under this Act or under the corresponding law in force in that State and may, by notification, render the application of this Chapter in relation to a foreign State with which reciprocal arrangements have been made subject to such modifications, exceptions, conditions and qualifications as may be deemed expedient for implementing the agreement with that State.

(11) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) if, in the course of an investigation into the affairs of the company, an application is made to the competent court in India by the inspector stating that evidence is, or may be, available in a country or place outside India, such court may issue a letter of request to a court or an authority in such country or place, competent to deal with such request, to examine orally, or otherwise, any person, supposed to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case, to record his statement made in the course of such examination and also to require such person or any other person to produce any document or thing, which may be in his possession pertaining to the case, and to forward all the evidence so taken or collected or the authenticated copies thereof or the things so collected to the court in India which had issued such letter of request:

Provided that the letter of request shall be transmitted in such manner as the Central Government may specify in this behalf:

Provided further that every statement recorded or document or thing received under this sub-section shall be deemed to be the evidence collected during the course of investigation.

(12) Upon receipt of a letter of request from a court or an authority in a country or place outside India, competent to issue such letter in that country or place for the examination of any person or production of any document or thing in relation to affairs of a company under investigation in that country or place, the Central Government may, if it thinks fit, forward such letter of request to the court concerned, which shall thereupon summon the person before it and record his statement or cause any document or thing to be produced, or send the letter to any inspector for investigation, who shall thereupon investigate into the affairs of company in the same manner as the affairs of a company are investigated under this Act and the inspector shall submit the report to such court within thirty days or such extended time as the court may allow for further action:

Provided that the evidence taken or collected under this sub-section or authenticated copies thereof or the things so collected shall be forwarded by the court, to the Central Government for transmission, in such manner as the Central Government may deem fit, to the court or the authority in country or place outside India which had issued the letter of request.

Section 217, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Exalogic Solutions Private Limited vs The Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office

    High Court 16 Feb 2024 Persuasive (High Court, Single Bench)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The Court held that an interim report of an inquiry ordered into the affairs of a company under section 210 is a sufficient statutory foundation for the Central Government to assign the investigation to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office under section 212, whereupon the Registrar's inquiry ceases and the records are transferred; the company has no right to prior notice or hearing at that stage, natural justice operating at the adjudication stage and not at the investigation stage.

    On this section: Applies Section 217 as the source of the SFIO Investigating Officer's powers and enforces the Section 217(2) obligation of the company and its officers to produce documents and furnish explanations, refusing to interfere with such a notice at the investigation stage.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. Supreme Court of India 27 Mar 2019 SCIN010021332019

    … Director 4. And further, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 212(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, Sh. Prashant Baliyan, Dy. Director is appointed as Investigating Officer to carry out the above noted investigation. The Investigating Officer shall have the powers of Inspector as enumerated under Section 217 of the Companies Act, 2013. As per the investigation order, following issues are specifically to be examined along with other issues which may come across during the investigation: (i) To ascertain and unearth rotation of funds or identification of quantum of diversion of funds or siphoning including beneficiaries …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 06 Dec 2023 DLHC010145952020

    … The said investigation shall be carried out by officers of the as nominated by Director, SFIO. - 5. That the Inspector(s) so appointed shall exercise all the powers available to him under section 217 of the Companies Act, 2013 including power conferred under section 219 of the Companies Act, 2013 after seeking approval of Central Government where ever required. The inspector(s) complete the investigation and submit the report to the Central Government within a period of 03 (three) Months. - 6. This order is …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 21 Dec 2022 DLHC010224202022

    … Counsel argues that the petitioner was merely a signing authority for the company, who functioned on the instructions of her husband and main accused Suman Chadha; and that Suman Chadha has so stated on oath in his statements dated 17.07.2017 and 23.08.2017 recorded under section 217 of the Companies Act. - 16. It is further submitted that since both the petitioner and her husband are in judicial custody, among other things, there is no one to look after the petitioner"s 88-year old father-in-law, who is currently in the care of the petitioner"s married daughter. That apart, it is submitted …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

1 instrument states that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 217

What have the courts held on Section 217 of the Companies Act?

Exalogic Solutions Private Limited vs The Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (16 Feb 2024) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Applies Section 217 as the source of the SFIO Investigating Officer's powers and enforces the Section 217(2) obligation of the company and its officers to produce documents and furnish explanations, refusing to interfere with such a notice at the investigation stage.

How do I find court cases under Section 217 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 217, section 217 Companies Act, section 217 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 2013 section 217. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Exalogic Solutions Private Limited vs The Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (16 Feb 2024).

What should I read with Section 217 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 212 (Investigation into affairs of company by Serious Fraud Investigation Office), section 219 (Power of inspector to conduct investigation into affairs of related companies, etc), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there is one: most recently Chapter XIV- The Companies (Inspection, Investigation and Inquiry) Rules, 2014. (2014).

When did Section 217 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 217 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 217, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.