Section143
The Companies Act, 2013

Powers and duties of auditors and auditing standards

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 9 provisions Instruments 23

Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with powers and duties of auditors and auditing standards. Every auditor of a company shall have a right of access at all times to the books of account and vouchers of the company, whether kept at the registered office of the company or at any other place and shall be entitled to require from the officers of the company such information and explanation as h The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) Every auditor of a company shall have a right of access at all times to the books of account and vouchers of the company, whether kept at the registered office of the company or at any other place and shall be entitled to require from the officers of the company such information and explanation as he may consider necessary for the performance of his duties as auditor and amongst other matters inquire into the following matters, namely:--

(a) whether loans and advances made by the company on the basis of security have been properly secured and whether the terms on which they have been made are prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members;

(b) whether transactions of the company which are represented merely by book entries are prejudicial to the interests of the company;

(c) where the company not being an investment company or a banking company, whether so much of the assets of the company as consist of shares, debentures and other securities have been sold at a price less than that at which they were purchased by the company;

(d) whether loans and advances made by the company have been shown as deposits;

(e) whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue account;

(f) where it is stated in the books and documents of the company that any shares have been allotted for cash, whether cash has actually been received in respect of such allotment, and if no cash has actually been so received, whether the position as stated in the account books and the balance sheet is correct, regular and not misleading:

Provided that the auditor of a company which is a holding company shall also have the right of access to the records of all 2[its subsidiaries and associate companies] in so far as it relates to the consolidation of its financial statements with that of 1[its subsidiaries and associate companies.]

(2) The auditor shall make a report to the members of the company on the accounts examined by him and on every financial statements which are required by or under this Act to be laid before the company in general meeting and the report shall after taking into account the provisions of this Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of this Act or any rules made thereunder or under any order made under sub-section (11) and to the best of his information and knowledge, the said accounts, financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the company's affairs as at the end of its financial year and profit or loss and cash flow for the year and such other matters as may be prescribed.

(3) The auditor's report shall also state--

(a) whether he has sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of his knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of his audit and if not, the details thereof and the effect of such information on the financial statements;

(b) whether, in his opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the company so far as appears from his examination of those books and proper returns adequate for the purposes of his audit have been received from branches not visited by him;

(c) whether the report on the accounts of any branch office of the company audited under subsection

(8) by a person other than the company's auditor has been sent to him under the proviso to that sub-section and the manner in which he has dealt with it in preparing his report;

(d) whether the company's balance sheet and profit and loss account dealt with in the report are in agreement with the books of account and returns;

(e) whether, in his opinion, the financial statements comply with the accounting standards;

(f) the observations or comments of the auditors on financial transactions or matters which have any adverse effect on the functioning of the company;

(g) whether any director is disqualified from being appointed as a director under sub-section (2) of section 164;

(h) any qualification, reservation or adverse remark relating to the maintenance of accounts and other matters connected therewith;

(i) whether the company has adequate 3[internal financial controls with reference to financial statements] in place and the operating effectiveness of such controls;

(j) such other matters as may be prescribed.

(4) Where any of the matters required to be included in the audit report under this section is answered in the negative or with a qualification, the report shall state the reasons therefor.

(5) 4[In the case of a Government company or any other company owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Central Government, or by any State Government or Governments, or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India shall appoint the auditor under sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of Section 139 and direct such auditor the manner in which the accounts of the company are required to be audited and] thereupon the auditor so appointed shall submit a copy of the audit report to the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India which, among other things, include the directions, if any, issued by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, the action taken thereon and its impact on the accounts and financial statement of the company.

(6) The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall within sixty days from the date of receipt of the audit report under sub-section (5) have a right to,--

(a) conduct a supplementary audit of the financial statement of the company by such person or persons as he may authorise in this behalf; and for the purposes of such audit, require information or additional information to be furnished to any person or persons, so authorised, on such matters, by such person or persons, and in such form, as the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India may direct; and

(b) comment upon or supplement such audit report:

Provided that any comments given by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India upon, or supplement to, the audit report shall be sent by the company to every person entitled to copies of audited financial statements under sub section (1) of section 136 and also be placed before the annual general meeting of the company at the same time and in the same manner as the audit report.

(7) Without prejudice to the provisions of this Chapter, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India may, in case of any company covered under sub-section (5) or sub-section (7) of section 139, if he considers necessary, by an order, cause test audit to be conducted of the accounts of such company and the provisions of section 19A of the Comptroller and Auditor-General's (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 (56 of 1971), shall apply to the report of such test audit.

(8) Where a company has a branch office, the accounts of that office shall be audited either by the auditor appointed for the company (herein referred to as the company's auditor) under this Act or by any other person qualified for appointment as an auditor of the company under this Act and appointed as such under section 139, or where the branch office is situated in a country outside India, the accounts of the branch office shall be audited either by the company's auditor or by an accountant or by any other person duly qualified to act as an auditor of the accounts of the branch office in accordance with the laws of that country and the duties and powers of the company's auditor with reference to the audit of the branch and the branch auditor, if any, shall be such as may be prescribed:

Provided that the branch auditor shall prepare a report on the accounts of the branch examined by him and send it to the auditor of the company who shall deal with it in his report in such manner as he considers necessary.

(9) Every auditor shall comply with the auditing standards.

(10) The Central Government may prescribe the standards of auditing or any addendum thereto, as recommended by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, constituted under section 3 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949), in consultation with and after examination of the recommendations made by the National Financial Reporting Authority:

Provided that until any auditing standards are notified, any standard or standards of auditing specified by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India shall be deemed to be the auditing standards.

(11) The Central Government may, in consultation with the National Financial Reporting Authority, by general or special order, direct, in respect of such class or description of companies, as may be specified in the order, that the auditor's report shall also include a statement on such matters as may be specified therein.

5[Provided that until the National Financial Reporting Authority is constituted under section 132, the Central Government may hold consultation required under this sub-section with the Committee chaired by an officer of the rank of Joint Secretary or equivalent in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Committee shall have the representatives from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Industry Chambers and also special invitees from the National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards and the office of the Comptroller and Auditor-General.]

6[(12) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, if an auditor of a company, in the course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed.

Provided that in case of a fraud involving lesser than the specified amount, the auditor shall report the matter to the audit committee constituted under section 177 or to the Board in other cases within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed:

Provided further that the companies, whose auditors have reported frauds under this sub-section to the audit committee or the Board but not reported to the Central Government, shall disclose the details about such frauds in the Board's report in such manner as may be prescribed.]

(13) No duty to which an auditor of a company may be subject to shall be regarded as having been contravened by reason of his reporting the matter referred to in sub-section (12) if it is done in good faith.

(14) The provisions of this section shall mutatis mutandis apply to--

(a) the 7[cost accountant] conducting cost audit under section 148; or

(b) the company secretary in practice conducting secretarial audit under section 204.

8 [(15) If any auditor, cost accountant, or company secretary in practice does not comply with the provisions of sub-section (12), he shall, --

(a) in case of a listed company, be liable to a penalty of five lakh rupees; and

(b) in case of any other company, be liable to a penalty of one lakh rupees.]

Section 143, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Kalpesh J Mehta vs Union of India

    Supreme Court of India 03 May 2023 Binding (Supreme Court)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    In the IL&FS Financial Services auditor proceedings the Court held that the statutory auditor's duties under the Companies Act, 2013 - including the independent duty to report suspected fraud to the Central Government - are substantive obligations whose breach founds action against the auditor, and that an auditor who colludes in falsifying the accounts cannot escape the statutory consequences by resigning, since resignation does not render proceedings against him infructuous.

    On this section: Reads the auditor's reporting obligation in section 143 (and the fraud-reporting duty in section 143(12)) as the measure of the duty the IL&FS auditors were found to have breached, and as the reason the Act treats auditor accountability stringently.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited vs Bishal Jaiswal

    Supreme Court of India Binding (Supreme Court)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The Court held that an entry in a corporate debtor's audited balance sheet can amount to an acknowledgement of liability under section 18 of the Limitation Act, but that the balance sheet must be read together with the auditor's report and the notes annexed to the accounts: where the auditor's report or the notes enter a caveat disclaiming or qualifying the entry, the acknowledgement fails.

    On this section: Gives the auditor's report made under section 143 substantive legal effect, holding that its qualifications and caveats control how the audited financial statements are to be read against the company.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  3. Udayan Sen vs Union of India

    Supreme Court of India Binding (Supreme Court)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Deciding the connected appeals of the IL&FS auditors, the Court held that auditor independence and the auditor's statutory duties under the Companies Act, 2013 are not personal privileges but public obligations, and that the Tribunal retains jurisdiction to determine an auditor's fraudulent conduct notwithstanding his resignation, with the five-year disqualification following as a statutory consequence.

    On this section: Treats the section 143 audit and reporting duties as the source of the auditor's obligations whose fraudulent breach the Tribunal was entitled to inquire into.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 07 Feb 2025 DLHC010118542020

    … It was further submitted that the obligation to comply with SAs too was one which existed even prior to the introduction of Section 132 as would be manifest from a reading of Section 143(9) of the Companies Act alongside Section 147(2) thereof. It was argued that by virtue of the aforenoted two statutory provisions, non-compliance with SAs was a criminal offence which existed and stood recognized by law even prior to 2018 when Section 132 came to be introduced. It was thus submitted by Mr. Hossain …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 07 Feb 2025 DLHC010117992020

    … It was further submitted that the obligation to comply with SAs too was one which existed even prior to the introduction of Section 132 as would be manifest from a reading of Section 143(9) of the Companies Act alongside Section 147(2) thereof. It was argued that by virtue of the aforenoted two statutory provisions, non-compliance with SAs was a criminal offence which existed and stood recognized by law even prior to 2018 when Section 132 came to be introduced. It was thus submitted by Mr. Hossain …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 07 Feb 2025 DLHC010118162020

    … It was further submitted that the obligation to comply with SAs too was one which existed even prior to the introduction of Section 132 as would be manifest from a reading of Section 143(9) of the Companies Act alongside Section 147(2) thereof. It was argued that by virtue of the aforenoted two statutory provisions, non-compliance with SAs was a criminal offence which existed and stood recognized by law even prior to 2018 when Section 132 came to be introduced. It was thus submitted by Mr. Hossain …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

8 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 15 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 143

What have the courts held on Section 143 of the Companies Act?

Kalpesh J Mehta vs Union of India (03 May 2023) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Reads the auditor's reporting obligation in section 143 (and the fraud-reporting duty in section 143(12)) as the measure of the duty the IL&FS auditors were found to have breached, and as the reason the Act treats auditor accountability stringently. Another 2 judgments on this section are set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court.

How do I find court cases under Section 143 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 143, section 143 Companies Act, section 143 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 143(3) and companies act 143(3)(i). Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 3 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Kalpesh J Mehta vs Union of India (03 May 2023).

What should I read with Section 143 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on Chartered Accountants Act 3 (Incorporation of the Institute), section 132 (Constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority), section 136 (Right of member to copies of audited financial statement), section 139 (Appointment of auditors), and on 4 further provisions, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 9 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 8: most recently G.S.R. 206(E)-Companies (Audit and Auditors) Amendment Rules, 2021. (2021), then G.S.R. 248(E)-Companies (Audit and Auditors) Second Amendment Rules, 2021 (2021), and 6 more.

When did Section 143 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 143 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 143, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.