Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and members
Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and members. Where a compromise or arrangement is proposed-- (a) between a company and its creditors or any class of them; The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.
(1) Where a compromise or arrangement is proposed--
(a) between a company and its creditors or any class of them; or
(b) between a company and its members or any class of them,
the Tribunal may, on the application of the company or of any creditor or member of the company, or in the case of a company which is being wound up, of the liquidator, 1[appointed under this Act or under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), as the case may be,] order a meeting of the creditors or class of creditors, or of the members or class of members, as the case may be, to be called, held and conducted in such manner as the Tribunal directs.
Explanation.-- For the purposes of this sub-section, arrangement includes a reorganisation of the company's share capital by the consolidation of shares of different classes or by the division of shares into shares of different classes, or by both of those methods.
(2) The company or any other person, by whom an application is made under subsection (1), shall disclose to the Tribunal by affidavit--
(a) all material facts relating to the company, such as the latest financial position of the company, the latest auditors report on the accounts of the company and the pendency of any investigation or proceedings against the company;
(b) reduction of share capital of the company, if any, included in the compromise or arrangement;
(c) any scheme of corporate debt restructuring consented to by not less than seventy-five per cent. of the secured creditors in value, including--
(i) a creditors responsibility statement in the prescribed form;
(ii) safeguards for the protection of other secured and unsecured creditors;
(iii) report by the auditor that the fund requirements of the company after the corporate debt restructuring as approved shall conform to the liquidity test based upon the estimates provided to them by the Board;
(iv) where the company proposes to adopt the corporate debt restructuring guidelines specified by the Reserve Bank of India, a statement to that effect; and
(v) a valuation report in respect of the shares and the property and all assets, tangible and intangible, movable and immovable, of the company by a registered valuer.
(3) Where a meeting is proposed to be called in pursuance of an order of the Tribunal under subsection (1), a notice of such meeting shall be sent to all the creditors or class of creditors and to all the members or class of members and the debenture-holders of the company, individually at the address registered with the company which shall be accompanied by a statement disclosing the details of the compromise or arrangement, a copy of the valuation report, if any, and explaining their effect on creditors, key managerial personnel, promoters and non-promoter members, and the debenture-holders and the effect of the compromise or arrangement on any material interests of the directors of the company or the debenture trustees, and such other matters as may be prescribed:
Provided that such notice and other documents shall also be placed on the website of the company, if any, and in case of a listed company, these documents shall be sent to the Securities and Exchange Board and stock exchange where the securities of the companies are listed, for placing on their website and shall also be published in newspapers in such manner as may be prescribed:
Provided further that where the notice for the meeting is also issued by way of an advertisement, it shall indicate the time within which copies of the compromise or arrangement shall be made available to the concerned persons free of charge from the registered office of the company.
(4) A notice under sub-section (3) shall provide that the persons to whom the notice is sent may vote in the meeting either themselves or through proxies or by postal ballot to the adoption of the compromise or arrangement within one month from the date of receipt of such notice:
Provided that any objection to the compromise or arrangement shall be made only by persons holding not less than ten per cent. of the shareholding or having outstanding debt amounting to not less than five per cent. of the total outstanding debt as per the latest audited financial statement.
(5) A notice under sub-section (3) along with all the documents in such form as may be prescribed shall also be sent to the Central Government, the income-tax authorities, the Reserve Bank of India, the Securities and Exchange Board, the Registrar, the respective stock exchanges, the Official Liquidator, the Competition Commission of India established under sub-section (1) of section 7 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), if necessary, and such other sectoral regulators or authorities which are likely to be affected by the compromise or arrangement and shall require that representations, if any, to be made by them shall be made within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of such notice, failing which, it shall be presumed that they have no representations to make on the proposals.
(6) Where, at a meeting held in pursuance of sub-section (1), majority of persons representing threefourths in value of the creditors, or class of creditors or members or class of members, as the case may be, voting in person or by proxy or by postal ballot, agree to any compromise or arrangement and if such compromise or arrangement is sanctioned by the Tribunal by an order, the same shall be binding on the company, all the creditors, or class of creditors or members or class of members, as the case may be, or, in case of a company being wound up, on the liquidator 2[appointed under this act or under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), as the case may be,] and the contributories of the company
(7) An order made by the Tribunal under sub-section (6) shall provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:--
(a) where the compromise or arrangement provides for conversion of preference shares into equity shares, such preference shareholders shall be given an option to either obtain arrears of dividend in cash or accept equity shares equal to the value of the dividend payable;
(b) the protection of any class of creditors;
(c) if the compromise or arrangement results in the variation of the shareholders rights, it shall be given effect to under the provisions of section 48;
(d) if the compromise or arrangement is agreed to by the creditors under sub-section (6), any proceedings pending before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction established under section 4 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (1 of 1986) shall abate;
(e) such other matters including exit offer to dissenting shareholders, if any, as are in the opinion of the Tribunal necessary to effectively implement the terms of the compromise or arrangement:
Provided that no compromise or arrangement shall be sanctioned by the Tribunal unless a certificate by the company's auditor has been filed with the Tribunal to the effect that the accounting treatment, if any, proposed in the scheme of compromise or arrangement is in conformity with the accounting standards prescribed under section 133.
(8) The order of the Tribunal shall be filed with the Registrar by the company within a period of thirty days of the receipt of the order.
(9) The Tribunal may dispense with calling of a meeting of creditor or class of creditors where such creditors or class of creditors, having at least ninety per cent. value, agree and confirm, by way of affidavit, to the scheme of compromise or arrangement.
(10) No compromise or arrangement in respect of any buy-back of securities under this section shall be sanctioned by the Tribunal unless such buy-back is in accordance with the provisions of section 68.
(11) Any compromise or arrangement may include takeover offer made in such manner as may be prescribed:
Provided that in case of listed companies, takeover offer shall be as per the regulations framed by the Securities and Exchange Board
(12) An aggrieved party may make an application to the Tribunal in the event of any grievances with respect to the takeover offer of companies other than listed companies in such manner as may be prescribed and the Tribunal may, on application, pass such order as it may deem fit.
Explanation.-- For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the provisions of section 66 shall not apply to the reduction of share capital effected in pursuance of the order of the Tribunal under this section.
Section 230, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Referred to by 8
- s. 231 Power to Tribunal to enforce compromise or arrangement
- s. 232 Merger and amalgamation of companies
- s. 233 Merger or amalgamation of certain companies
- s. 468 Power of Central Government to make rules relating to winding up
- Income-tax Act s. 2 Definitions
- Income-tax Act s. 70 Transactions not regarded as transfer
- Maharashtra Stamp Act s. 2 Definitions
- Maharashtra Stamp Act s. 76 Repeal of enactments
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Judgement of Main Case order-14.pdf 2021-03-15 (not same-date order-15 ROP). CA 2019. A person ineligible under IBC s.29A cannot propose a compromise or arrangement under Companies Act 2013 s.230 in respect of a company in liquidation; s.230 cannot be used to launder an ineligible promoter back in. Map companies-act 230.
On this section: s.230 compromise or arrangement cannot be used by an IBC s.29A-ineligible person to regain control of a company in liquidation. s.230 is not a back door around 29A.
-
Raman Prakash Mangla vs Anuj Jain
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
The Adjudicating Authority has limited jurisdiction in approving a resolution plan, circumscribed by Sections 30(2) and 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Authority cannot interfere with the commercial aspects of the decision taken by the Committee of Creditors. If the Adjudicating Authority finds shortcomings in the resolution plan vis-à-vis the specified parameters of keeping the corporate debtor as a going concern, maximizing the value of its assets, and taking care of interests of all stakeholders, it must send the plan back to the Committee of Creditors for reconsideration, not modify the plan itself. Payment to dissenting financial creditors must be in monetary terms, not in kind or through transfer of equity or land. Once homebuyers as a class vote in favor of a resolution plan through their authorized representative, individual homebuyers cannot challenge the plan as dissenting creditors or aggrieved persons. The INR 750 crores deposited by the holding company pursuant to Supreme Court orders in Chitra Sharma is the property of the holding company, not the corporate debtor, and cannot be appropriated by the corporate debtor or the resolution applicant.
On this section: Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors or members
-
Rajesh Gupta vs Nbcc (india) LTD
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
The Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction in approving a resolution plan is limited to verifying compliance with the mandatory requirements specified in Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Authority cannot modify the commercial terms of a resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors by the requisite majority (66% or more of voting share). If the Authority finds that the resolution plan does not meet the specified parameters (keeping corporate debtor as going concern, maximizing asset value, protecting stakeholder interests), it must remit the plan back to the Committee of Creditors for reconsideration rather than modifying it itself. The commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors is non-justiciable and cannot be interfered with by the Adjudicating Authority or Appellate Authority on equitable or quantitative grounds. Dissenting financial creditors must receive payment in monetary terms (cash) equivalent to their liquidation value, not in kind through equity or land transfers. The INR 750 crores deposited by the holding company JAL pursuant to Supreme Court orders in the Chitra Sharma case remains the property of JAL and cannot be treated as an asset of the corporate debtor JIL for purposes of the resolution plan. Homebuyers as a class are bound by the decision of their authorized representative in the Committee of Creditors under Section 25A(3A), and individual homebuyers cannot maintain separate challenges to the resolution plan. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevails over the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 in case of conflict, though both statutes must be interpreted harmoniously. Concession Agreements with statutory authorities are not statutory contracts and their material terms cannot be modified without the consent of the other contracting party. Security interests not avoided under Section 43 of the Code cannot be unilaterally extinguished through a resolution plan.
On this section: Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors or members; not applicable to CIRP proceedings
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… 3/4th in value of the creditors or class of creditors or members or class of members agree to a compromise or arrangement and upon its sanction by the Tribunal, it shall be binding on the company and all the creditors or class of creditors or members or class of members and the contributories of the company. Section 230 of the Companies Act provides for the manner in which dissenting or abstaining creditors within a class of creditors of the company (such as debenture holders) can be bound by the terms of the compromise or arrangement upon approval by a special majority and by the NCLT. - 35. Section 1(4) of the Companies Act, …
-
… In the meanwhile, CCI and SEBI approved the composite Scheme proposed by FRLReliance. Thereafter, FRL filed for sanction of the composite Scheme of arrangement under the provisions of Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 before National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). - 9. Amazon filed a Petition for enforcement of the Emergency Arbitrator Award, under Section 17(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Delhi High Court on 25.01.2021 and the same was heard for the first time on …
-
… the 'primary focus of the legislation is to ensure revival and continuation of the corporate debtor by protecting the corporate debtor from its own management and from a corporate death by liquidation'. > 11. The aforesaid judgment makes it clear that even during the period of Liquidation, for the purpose of Section 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, the 'Corporate Debtor' is to be saved from its own management, meaning thereby the Promoters, who are ineligible under Section 29A, are not entitled to file application for Compromise and Arrangement in their favour under Section 230 to 232 of the Companies Act. Proviso to Section 35(f) …
Made under this section, and citing it
8 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.
- G.S.R. NO. 401(E) Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2022 Dated 30.05.2022Rule 2022
- G.S.R. 93(E)-Companies (compromises, arrangements and amalgamations) Amendment Rules 2021Rule 2021
- Companies (Compromises,Arrangments and Amalgamtions) 2nd Amdt Rules 2020Rule 2020
- NCLT(amendment) Rules 2020Rule 2020
- commencement notification dt 03.02.2020Notification 2020
- companies (compromise, arrangment and amalgamation) Amdt Rules 2020Rule 2020
- Commencement notification dated 07.12.2016Notification 2016
- Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016Rule 2016
Another 3 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
Questions about Section 230
What have the courts held on Section 230 of the Companies Act?
Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (15 Mar 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.230 compromise or arrangement cannot be used by an IBC s.29A-ineligible person to regain control of a company in liquidation. s.230 is not a back door around 29A. Another 2 judgments on this section are set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court.
How do I find court cases under Section 230 of the Companies Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 230, section 230 Companies Act, section 230 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 230 232 and section 230 of companies act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 3 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (15 Mar 2021).
What should I read with Section 230 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 48 (Variation of shareholders‘ rights), section 66 (Reduction of share capital), section 68 (Power of company to purchase its own securities), section 133 (Central Government to prescribe accounting standards), and on 1 further provision, so none of them can safely be read on its own. 8 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 8: most recently G.S.R. NO. 401(E) Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Amendment Rules, 2022 Dated 30.05.2022 (2022), then G.S.R. 93(E)-Companies (compromises, arrangements and amalgamations) Amendment Rules 2021 (2021), and 6 more.
When did Section 230 of the Companies Act come into force?
Section 230 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 230, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions5089 words
- 143. Powers and duties of auditors and auditing standards1867 words
- 232. Merger and amalgamation of companies1416 words
- 149. Company to have Board of Directors1403 words
- 217. Procedure, powers, etc., of inspectors1390 words
- 197. Overall maximum managerial remuneration and managerial remuneration in case of absence or inadequacy of profits1314 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.