Section149
The Companies Act, 2013

Company to have Board of Directors

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 8 provisions Instruments 30

Section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with company to have Board of Directors. Every company shall have a Board of Directors consisting of individuals as directors and shall have-- (a) a minimum number of three directors in the case of a public company, two directors in the case of a private company, and one director in the case of a One Person Company; The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) Every company shall have a Board of Directors consisting of individuals as directors and shall have--

(a) a minimum number of three directors in the case of a public company, two directors in the case of a private company, and one director in the case of a One Person Company; and

(b) a maximum of fifteen directors:

Provided that a company may appoint more than fifteen directors after passing a special resolution:

Provided further that such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall have at least one woman director.

(2) Every company existing on or before the date of commencement of this Act shall within one year from such commencement comply with the requirements of the provisions of sub-section (1).

1[(3) Every company shall have at least one director who stays in India for a total period of not less than one hundred and eighty-two days during the financial year:

Provided that in case of a newly incorporated company the requirement under this sub-section shall apply proportionately at the end of the financial year in which it is incorporated];

(4) Every listed public company shall have at least one-third of the total number of directors as independent directors and the Central Government may prescribe the minimum number of independent directors in case of any class or classes of public companies.

Explanation.-- For the purposes of this sub-section, any fraction contained in such one-third number shall be rounded off as one.

(5) Every company existing on or before the date of commencement of this Act shall, within one year from such commencement or from the date of notification of the rules in this regard as may be applicable, comply with the requirements of the provisions of sub-section (4).

(6) An independent director in relation to a company, means a director other than a managing director--

or a whole-time director or a nominee director,

(a) who, in the opinion of the Board, is a person of integrity and possesses relevant expertise and experience;

(b) (i) who is or was not a promoter of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company;

(ii) who is not related to promoters or directors in the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company;

(c) who has or had no 2[pecuniary relationship, other than remuneration as such director or having transaction not exceeding ten per cent. of his total income or such amount as may be prescribed,] with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company, or their promoters, or directors, during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year;

3[(d) none of whose relatives--

(i) is holding any security of or interest in the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year:

Provided that the relative may hold security or interest in the company of face value not exceeding fifty lakh rupees or two per cent. of the paid-up capital of the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or such higher sum as may be prescribed;

(ii) is indebted to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors, in excess of such amount as may be prescribed during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year;

(iii) has given a guarantee or provided any security in connection with the indebtedness of any third person to the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors of such holding company, for such amount as may be prescribed during the two immediately preceding financial years or during the current financial year; or

(iv) has any other pecuniary transaction or relationship with the company, or its subsidiary, or its holding or associate company amounting to two per cent. or more of its gross turnover or total income singly or in combination with the transactions referred to in sub-clause (i), (ii) or (iii);]

(e) who, neither himself nor any of his relatives

(i) holds or has held the position of a key managerial personnel or is or has been employee of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company in any of the three financial years immediately preceding the financial year in which he is proposed to be appointed;

4[Provided that in case of a relative who is an employee, the restriction under this clause shall not apply for his employment during preceding three financial years.]

(ii) is or has been an employee or proprietor or a partner, in any of the three financial years immediately preceding the financial year in which he is proposed to be appointed, of

(A) a firm of auditors or company secretaries in practice or cost auditors of the company or its holding, subsidiary or associate company; or

(B) any legal or a consulting firm that has or had any transaction with the company, its holding, subsidiary or associate company amounting to ten per cent. or more of the gross turnover of such firm;

(iii) holds together with his relatives two per cent. or more of the total voting power of the company; or

(iv) is a Chief Executive or director, by whatever name called, of any nonprofit organisation that receives twenty-five per cent. or more of its receipts from the company, any of its promoters, directors or its holding, subsidiary or associate company or that holds two per cent. or more of the total voting power of the company; or

(f) who possesses such other qualifications as may be prescribed.

(7) Every independent director shall at the first meeting of the Board in which he participates as a director and thereafter at the first meeting of the Board in every financial year or whenever there is any change in the circumstances which may affect his status as an independent director, give a declaration that he meets the criteria of independence as provided in sub-section (6).

Explanation.-- For the purposes of this section, nominee director means a director nominated by any financial institution in pursuance of the provisions of any law for the time being in force, or of any agreement, or appointed by any Government, or any other person to represent its interests.

(8) The company and independent directors shall abide by the provisions specified in Schedule IV.

(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act, but subject to the provisions of sections 197 and 198, an independent director shall not be entitled to any stock option and may receive remuneration by way of fee provided under sub-section (5) of section 197, reimbursement of expenses for participation in the Board and other meetings and profit related commission as may be approved by the members.

5[Provided that if a company has no profits or its profits are inadequate, an independent director may receive remuneration, exclusive of any fees payable under sub-section (5) of section 197, in accordance with the provisions of Schedule V.]

(10) Subject to the provisions of section 152, an independent director shall hold office for a term up to five consecutive years on the Board of a company, but shall be eligible for reappointment on passing of a special resolution by the company and disclosure of such appointment in the Board's report.

(11) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (10), no independent director shall hold office for more than two consecutive terms, but such independent director shall be eligible for appointment after the expiration of three years of ceasing to become an independent director:

Provided that an independent director shall not, during the said period of three years, be appointed in or be associated with the company in any other capacity, either directly or indirectly.

Explanation.-- For the purposes of sub-sections (10) and (11), any tenure of an independent director on the date of commencement of this Act shall not be counted as a term under those sub-sections.

(12) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act,--

(i) an independent director;

(ii) a non-executive director not being promoter or key managerial personnel,

shall be held liable, only in respect of such acts of omission or commission by a company which had occurred with his knowledge, attributable through Board processes, and with his consent or connivance or where he had not acted diligently.

(13) The provisions of sub-sections (6) and (7) of section 152 in respect of retirement of directors by rotation shall not be applicable to appointment of independent directors.

Section 149, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Tata Industries Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt. LTD

    Supreme Court of India 26 Mar 2021 Binding (SC) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The removal of a Director from office, even if carried out in a manner that may be questioned on procedural grounds, cannot be termed as oppressive or prejudicial conduct under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, unless it is part of a larger design to oppress or prejudice the interests of some members. The invocation of the 'just and equitable' clause for winding up requires either a functional deadlock or an irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence in a quasi-partnership relationship. The affirmative voting rights of Directors nominated by institutional shareholders holding majority stakes are valid and do not constitute oppressive conduct. The Tribunal cannot grant reliefs not sought by the petitioners or not permitted under law, including reinstatement of a director after the expiry of his tenure. The conversion of a company from public to private status is valid if the company satisfies the statutory criteria for being classified as a private company, and the Tribunal cannot interfere with such conversion on the ground of lack of probity without establishing actual oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

    On this section: Appointment of independent directors. The Court discussed the statutory requirements for independent directors in listed companies and their applicability to Tata Sons.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Hemanta Sharma & Ors. v. The Registrar of Companies, Orissa

    High Court 30 Jan 2024 Persuasive (High Court DB — s.149(2) one-year compliance for existing companies runs from the Rule 3 woman-director prescription date (01.04.2014), not an earlier truncated start; penal consequences cannot curtail the provided window) COA No. 1/2023 (Orissa HC DB); Final Order / Judgment 30.01.2024 (Arindam Sinha & M.S. Sahoo JJ.); DATE-VERIFIED order-20.pdf

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE VERIFIED Final Order / Judgment 2024-01-30 (order-20.pdf). s.149(1) second proviso + Rule 3 require a woman director for prescribed classes; s.149(2) one-year compliance for pre-existing companies must be read from Rule 3 force date 01.04.2014 (to 31.03.2015). Where OERC interim takeover vested management in GRIDCO before window expiry, non-appointment complaint does not sustain conviction. Distinct from existing Cos §149 row on wrong CNR ODHC010222802023 (Southern Electricity).

    On this section: s.149 woman-director requirement and s.149(2) one-year compliance window for existing companies — clock from Rule 3 date; cannot be curtailed for penal prosecution.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  3. Hemanta Sharma v. Registrar of Companies, Orissa

    High Court 30 Jan 2024 Persuasive (High Court) COA Nos.1–6 of 2023; Judgment 30.01.2024 (Arindam Sinha & M.S. Sahoo JJ.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Penal prosecution under s.172 for breach of s.149(1) woman-director requirement cannot stand where the one-year compliance window under s.149(2) (read with Rule 3 from 01.04.2014) had not expired before GRIDCO takeover made the companies Government companies; non-executive directors also lack attributed mens rea.

    On this section: s.149(1) second proviso woman-director mandate and s.149(2) one-year compliance clock are the operative provisions whose construction leads to reversal of convictions.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  4. Har Sarup Bhasin v. M/s Origo Commodities India Private Limited

    High Court 07 Jan 2020 Persuasive (High Court) CRL.M.C. 1869/2019; Judgment 07.01.2020 (Anu Malhotra J.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Independent/non-executive directors attract NI Act s.138 vicarious liability only if the complaint discloses circumstances under Companies Act s.149(12); bald averments without day-to-day control or KMP role at the cheque dates warrant quashing of summons.

    On this section: s.149(12) is applied as the statutory shield limiting independent/NED liability; the Court quotes and applies it to quash NI Act summons.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 28 Nov 2023 DLHC010160142019

    … Chapter XI of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with appointment and qualifications of the directors. Section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that a company is required to have a Board of Directors. Section 149(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines as Independent Director. Independent director in relation to a company means a director other than a managing director or a wholetime director or a nominee director. Independent Director may be a person of integrity and may possess relevant expertise and experience. Independent …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

24 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 6 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 149

What have the courts held on Section 149 of the Companies Act?

Tata Industries Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt. LTD (26 Mar 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Appointment of independent directors. The Court discussed the statutory requirements for independent directors in listed companies and their applicability to Tata Sons. Another 3 judgments on this section are set out below, 1 of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2020 to 2024.

How do I find court cases under Section 149 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 149, section 149 Companies Act, section 149 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 149 6 and companies act 149 4. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 4 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Tata Industries Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt. LTD (26 Mar 2021).

What should I read with Section 149 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 152 (Appointment of directors), section 197 (Overall maximum managerial remuneration and managerial remuneration in case of absence or inadequacy of profits), section 198 (Calculation of profits), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 8 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 24: most recently G.S.R No. 38(E) Companies Appointment and Qualification of Directors Amendment Rules 2023 dated 20.01.2023 (2023), then G.S.R NO. 410 Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Amendment Rules, 2022 dated 01.06.2022 (2022), and 22 more.

When did Section 149 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 149 of the Companies Act, commonly called independent director, and cited as Companies Act 149, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.