Section152
The Companies Act, 2013

Appointment of directors

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 5 provisions Instruments 23

Section 152 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with appointment of directors. Where no provision is made in the articles of a company for the appointment of the first director, the subscribers to the memorandum who are individuals shall be deemed to be the first directors of the company until the directors are duly appointed and in case of a One Person Company an individual b The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) Where no provision is made in the articles of a company for the appointment of the first director, the subscribers to the memorandum who are individuals shall be deemed to be the first directors of the company until the directors are duly appointed and in case of a One Person Company an individual being member shall be deemed to be its first director until the director or directors are duly appointed by the member in accordance with the provisions of this section.

(2) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, every director shall be appointed by the company in general meeting.

(3) No person shall be appointed as a director of a company unless he has been allotted the Director Identification Number under section 154 1[or any other number as may be prescribed under section 153].

(4) Every person proposed to be appointed as a director by the company in general meeting or otherwise, shall furnish his Director Identification Number 1[or such other number as may be prescribed under section 153] and a declaration that he is not disqualified to become a director under this Act.

(5) A person appointed as a director shall not act as a director unless he gives his consent to hold the office as director and such consent has been filed with the Registrar within thirty days of his appointment in such manner as may be prescribed:

Provided that in the case of appointment of an independent director in the general meeting, an explanatory statement for such appointment, annexed to the notice for the general meeting, shall include a statement that in the opinion of the Board, he fulfils the conditions specified in this Act for such an appointment.

(6) (a) Unless the articles provide for the retirement of all directors at every annual general meeting, not less than two-thirds of the total number of directors of a public company shall--

(i) be persons whose period of office is liable to determination by retirement of directors by rotation; and

(ii) save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, be appointed by the company in general meeting.

(b) The remaining directors in the case of any such company shall, in default of, and subject to any regulations in the articles of the company, also be appointed by the company in general meeting.

(c) At the first annual general meeting of a public company held next after the date of the general meeting at which the first directors are appointed in accordance with clauses (a) and (b) and at every subsequent annual general meeting, one-third of such of the directors for the time being as are liable to retire by rotation, or if their number is neither three nor a multiple of three, then, the number nearest to one-third, shall retire from office.

(d) The directors to retire by rotation at every annual general meeting shall be those who have been longest in office since their last appointment, but as between persons who became directors on the same day, those who are to retire shall, in default of and subject to any agreement among themselves, be determined by lot.

(e) At the annual general meeting at which a director retires as aforesaid, the company may fill up the vacancy by appointing the retiring director or some other person thereto.

Explanation.-- For the purposes of this sub-section, "total number of directors" shall not include independent directors, whether appointed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, on the Board of a company.

(7) (a) If the vacancy of the retiring director is not so filled-up and the meeting has not expressly resolved not to fill the vacancy, the meeting shall stand adjourned till the same day in the next week, at the same time and place, or if that day is a national holiday, till the next succeeding day which is not a holiday, at the same time and place.

(b) If at the adjourned meeting also, the vacancy of the retiring director is not filled up and that meeting also has not expressly resolved not to fill the vacancy, the retiring director shall be deemed to have been re-appointed at the adjourned meeting, unless--

(i) at that meeting or at the previous meeting a resolution for the re-appointment of such director has been put to the meeting and lost;

(ii) the retiring director has, by a notice in writing addressed to the company or its Board of directors, expressed his unwillingness to be so re-appointed;

(iii) he is not qualified or is disqualified for appointment;

(iv) a resolution, whether special or ordinary, is required for his appointment or re-appointment by virtue of any provisions of this Act; or

(v) section 162 is applicable to the case.

Explanation.--For the purposes of this section and section 160, the expression "retiring director" means a director retiring by rotation.

Section 152, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Manish Kumar v. Topworth Urja & Metals Limited & Ors.

    High Court 19 Apr 2022 Persuasive (High Court) Appeal from Order No.363 of 2022 — Final Order 19.04.2022 (Bombay HC — Bharati Dangre J.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    DATE-VERIFIED Final Order 19.04.2022 (order-1.pdf): Suit sought declaration that board resolutions appointing directors (ss.152/161) were void. Court held the “matter” of director appointment irregularity in an oppression/mismanagement frame is for NCLT; s.430 ousts civil court — ad-interim relief rightly refused.

    On this section: Teaches s.152 appointment-of-directors disputes: when cast as oppression/mismanagement, exclusive Tribunal route applies.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 06 Feb 2025 DLHC010053852025

    … In the present case, even if the plaintiff is not re-appointed as a director in the 40th AGM, and if the Court ultimately finds that her removal was unlawful due to the overriding effect of Section 196 over Section 152 of the Companies Act, as well as the contractual rights, the grievance of the plaintiff can still be adequately redressed through compensation based on her letter of appointment and various other judicially determinable factors, thus balancing the equities. This approach would also ensure that the principles of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 09 Sep 2020 KLHC010389932020

    … Issue a direction to the Company that the Resolution passed by the majority shareholders at the AGM held at 4:00 pm on 31.10.2019, at the registered office of the Company, appointing Mr. Radha Ballabh Gupta as Director of the Company for a period of five years from 31.10.2019 to 30.10 2024, in accordance with Section 152 of the Companies Act, 2013, is in order is in order and, therefore, deserving to be confirmed. - III. Issue a direction to the Company that the Resolution passed by the majority shareholders at the AGM held at 4:00 pm on 31.10.2019 at the registered office of the Company, appointing Mrs. Sulochane Gupta (DIN: …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 21 Oct 2019 KAHC010410302019

    … The phrase "subject to the provisions of the Act" used in the Article enjoins a duty in the State Government to exercise the authority only in consonance with the Companies Act. In this background it is necessary to examine the provisions of Section 152 of the Companies Act, 2013, which deals with the appointment of Directors. "(3) No person shall be appointed as a director of a company unless he has been allotted the Director Identification Number under section 154. (5) A person appointed as a director shall not act as a director unless he gives his consent …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

14 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 9 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 152

What have the courts held on Section 152 of the Companies Act?

Manish Kumar v. Topworth Urja & Metals Limited & Ors. (19 Apr 2022) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Teaches s.152 appointment-of-directors disputes: when cast as oppression/mismanagement, exclusive Tribunal route applies.

How do I find court cases under Section 152 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 152, section 152 Companies Act, section 152 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type section 152 of companies act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Manish Kumar v. Topworth Urja & Metals Limited & Ors. (19 Apr 2022).

What should I read with Section 152 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 153 (Application for allotment of Director Identification Number), section 154 (Allotment of Director Identification Number), section 160 (Right of persons other than retiring directors to stand for directorship), section 162 (Appointment of directors to be voted individually), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 5 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 14: most recently G.S.R No. 38(E) Companies Appointment and Qualification of Directors Amendment Rules 2023 dated 20.01.2023 (2023), then G.S.R NO. 410 Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Amendment Rules, 2022 dated 01.06.2022 (2022), and 12 more.

When did Section 152 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 152 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 152, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.