Section139
The Companies Act, 2013

Appointment of auditors

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 7 provisions Instruments 16

Section 139 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with appointment of auditors. Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, every company shall, at the first annual general meeting, appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual general meeting and thereafter till the conclusion of e The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, every company shall, at the first annual general meeting, appoint an individual or a firm as an auditor who shall hold office from the conclusion of that meeting till the conclusion of its sixth annual general meeting and thereafter till the conclusion of every sixth meeting and the manner and procedure of selection of auditors by the members of the company at such meeting shall be such as may be prescribed:

1* * * * *

Provided further that before such appointment is made, the written consent of the auditor to such appointment, and a certificate from him or it that the appointment, if made, shall be in accordance with the conditions as may be prescribed, shall be obtained from the auditor:

Provided also that the certificate shall also indicate whether the auditor satisfies the criteria provided in section 141:

Provided also that the company shall inform the auditor concerned of his or its appointment, and also file a notice of such appointment with the Registrar within fifteen days of the meeting in which the auditor is appointed.

Explanation.-- For the purposes of this Chapter, "appointment" includes re-appointment.

(2) No listed company or a company belonging to such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall appoint or re-appoint--

(a) an individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years; and

(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years:

Provided that--

(i) an individual auditor who has completed his term under clause (a) shall not be eligible for re-appointment as auditor in the same company for five years from the completion of his term;

(ii) an audit firm which has completed its term under clause (b), shall not be eligible for reappointment as auditor in the same company for five years from the completion of such term:

Provided further that as on the date of appointment no audit firm having a common partner or partners to the other audit firm, whose tenure has expired in a company immediately preceding the financial year, shall be appointed as auditor of the same company for a period of five years:

2[Provided also that every company, existing on or before the commencement of this Act which is required to comply with provisions of this sub-section, shall comply with the requirements of this subsection within three years from the date of commencement of this Act:]

Provided also that, nothing contained in this sub-section shall prejudice the right of the company to remove an auditor or the right of the auditor to resign from such office of the company.

(3) Subject to the provisions of this Act, members of a company may resolve to provide that--

(a) in the audit firm appointed by it, the auditing partner and his team shall be rotated at such intervals as may be resolved by members; or

(b) the audit shall be conducted by more than one auditor.

(4) The Central Government may, by rules, prescribe the manner in which the companies shall rotate their auditors in pursuance of sub-section (2).

Explanation.-- For the purposes of this Chapter, the word "firm" shall include a limited liability partnership incorporated under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009).

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), in the case of a Government company or any other company owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Central Government, or by any State Government or Governments, or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India shall, in respect of a financial year, appoint an auditor duly qualified to be appointed as an auditor of companies under this Act, within a period of one hundred and eighty days from the commencement of the financial year, who shall hold office till the conclusion of the annual general meeting.

(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the first auditor of a company, other than a Government company, shall be appointed by the Board of Directors within thirty days from the date of registration of the company and in the case of failure of the Board to appoint such auditor, it shall inform the members of the company, who shall within ninety days at an extraordinary general meeting appoint such auditor and such auditor shall hold office till the conclusion of the first annual general meeting.

(7) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (5), in the case of a Government company or any other company owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Central Government, or by any State Government, or Governments, or partly by the Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments, the first auditor shall be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India within sixty days from the date of registration of the company and in case the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India does not appoint such auditor within the said period, the Board of Directors of the company shall appoint such auditor within the next thirty days; and in the case of failure of the Board to appoint such auditor within the next thirty days, it shall inform the members of the company who shall appoint such auditor within the sixty days at an extraordinary general meeting, who shall hold office till the conclusion of the first annual general meeting.

(8) Any casual vacancy in the office of an auditor shall--

(i) in the case of a company other than a company whose accounts are subject to audit by an auditor appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, be filled by the Board of Directors within thirty days, but if such casual vacancy is as a result of the resignation of an auditor, such appointment shall also be approved by the company at a general meeting convened within three months of the recommendation of the Board and he shall hold the office till the conclusion of the next annual general meeting;

(ii) in the case of a company whose accounts are subject to audit by an auditor appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, be filled by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India within thirty days:

Provided that in case the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India does not fill the vacancy within the said period, the Board of Directors shall fill the vacancy within next thirty days.

(9) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) and the rules made thereunder, a retiring auditor may be re-appointed at an annual general meeting, if--

(a) he is not disqualified for re-appointment;

(b) he has not given the company a notice in writing of his unwillingness to be re-appointed; and

(c) a special resolution has not been passed at that meeting appointing some other auditor or providing expressly that he shall not be re-appointed.

(10) Where at any annual general meeting, no auditor is appointed or re-appointed, the existing auditor shall continue to be the auditor of the company.

(11) Where a company is required to constitute an Audit Committee under section 177, all appointments, including the filling of a casual vacancy of an auditor under this section shall be made after taking into account the recommendations of such committee.

Section 139, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Kalpesh J Mehta vs Union of India

    Supreme Court of India 03 May 2023 Binding (Supreme Court)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    In the IL&FS Financial Services auditor proceedings the Court held that the statutory auditor's duties under the Companies Act, 2013 - including the independent duty to report suspected fraud to the Central Government - are substantive obligations whose breach founds action against the auditor, and that an auditor who colludes in falsifying the accounts cannot escape the statutory consequences by resigning, since resignation does not render proceedings against him infructuous.

    On this section: Construes the five-year statutory bar as a disqualification operating on the appointment of auditors under section 139, so that a company's power to appoint an auditor is cut down by a Tribunal finding of fraudulent conduct.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 07 Feb 2025 DLHC010118542020

    … Having noticed the rival submissions which were addressed on this score, we firstly turn our gaze on the principal provisions which are contained in the Companies Act and deal with the appointment and engagement of an auditor. As is manifest from a reading of Section 139 of the Companies Act, every company is entitled to appoint either an individual or a firm as its auditor. By virtue of Section 141 of the said enactment, the statute proceeds to prescribe conditions in respect of eligibility and the qualifications which must be held by an auditor appointed by a company. In terms of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 07 Feb 2025 DLHC010117992020

    … Having noticed the rival submissions which were addressed on this score, we firstly turn our gaze on the principal provisions which are contained in the Companies Act and deal with the appointment and engagement of an auditor. As is manifest from a reading of Section 139 of the Companies Act, every company is entitled to appoint either an individual or a firm as its auditor. By virtue of Section 141 of the said enactment, the statute proceeds to prescribe conditions in respect of eligibility and the qualifications which must be held by an auditor appointed by a company. In terms of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 07 Feb 2025 DLHC010118162020

    … Having noticed the rival submissions which were addressed on this score, we firstly turn our gaze on the principal provisions which are contained in the Companies Act and deal with the appointment and engagement of an auditor. As is manifest from a reading of Section 139 of the Companies Act, every company is entitled to appoint either an individual or a firm as its auditor. By virtue of Section 141 of the said enactment, the statute proceeds to prescribe conditions in respect of eligibility and the qualifications which must be held by an auditor appointed by a company. In terms of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

8 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.

Another 8 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 139

What have the courts held on Section 139 of the Companies Act?

Kalpesh J Mehta vs Union of India (03 May 2023) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Construes the five-year statutory bar as a disqualification operating on the appointment of auditors under section 139, so that a company's power to appoint an auditor is cut down by a Tribunal finding of fraudulent conduct.

How do I find court cases under Section 139 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 139, section 139 Companies Act, section 139 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 139(2) and companies act 139 1. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Kalpesh J Mehta vs Union of India (03 May 2023).

What should I read with Section 139 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 141 (Eligibility, qualifications and disqualifications of auditors), section 177 (Audit committee), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 7 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 8: most recently G.S.R NO. 624(E) Companies Accounts Fourth Amendment Rules 2022 dated 05.08.2022 (2022), then GS.R 456(E) Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Second Amendment Rules, 2022 dated 17.06.2022 (2022), and 6 more.

When did Section 139 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 139 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 139, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.