Section167
The Companies Act, 2013

Vacation of office of director

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 14 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 2 provisions Instruments 4

Section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with vacation of office of director. The office of a director shall become vacant in case-- (a) he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in section 164: [Provided that where he incurs disqualification under sub-section (2) of section 164, the office of the director shall become vacant in all the companies, other than the compan The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) The office of a director shall become vacant in case--

(a) he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in section 164:

1[Provided that where he incurs disqualification under sub-section (2) of section 164, the office of the director shall become vacant in all the companies, other than the company which is in default under that sub-section];

(b) he absents himself from all the meetings of the Board of Directors held during a period of twelve months with or without seeking leave of absence of the Board;

(c) he acts in contravention of the provisions of section 184 relating to entering into contracts or arrangements in which he is directly or indirectly interested;

(d) he fails to disclose his interest in any contract or arrangement in which he is directly or indirectly interested, in contravention of the provisions of section 184;

(e) he becomes disqualified by an order of a court or the Tribunal;

(f) he is convicted by a court of any offence, whether involving moral turpitude or otherwise and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than six months:

2[Provided that the office shall not be vacated by the director in case of orders referred to in clauses (e) and (f)--

(i) for thirty days from the date of conviction or order of disqualification;

(ii) where an appeal or petition is preferred within thirty days as aforesaid against the conviction resulting in sentence or order, until expiry of seven days from the date on which such appeal or petition is disposed of; or

(iii) where any further appeal or petition is preferred against order or sentence within seven days, until such further appeal or petition is disposed of.]

(g) he is removed in pursuance of the provisions of this Act;

(h) he, having been appointed a director by virtue of his holding any office or other employment in the holding, subsidiary or associate company, ceases to hold such office or other employment in that company.

(2) If a person, functions as a director even when he knows that the office of director held by him has become vacant on account of any of the disqualifications specified in sub-section (1), he shall be punishable 3*** with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to 4 [five lakh rupees].

(3) Where all the directors of a company vacate their offices under any of the disqualifications specified in sub-section (1), the promoter or, in his absence, the Central Government shall appoint the required number of directors who shall hold office till the directors are appointed by the company in the general meeting.

(4) A private company may, by its articles, provide any other ground for the vacation of the office of a director in addition to those specified in sub-section (1).

Section 167, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Sanjeev Kumar Saboo vs Union of India

    High Court 16 Jun 2021 Binding (Kerala)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Section 164(2) of the Companies Act 2013 is not retrospective; defaults prior to the financial year 2014-15 cannot be counted for disqualification of directors in private companies. Furthermore, DINs cannot be deactivated for Section 164(2) disqualifications as Rule 11 of the 2014 Rules does not provide for it.

    On this section: Vacation of office of director upon disqualification.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 20 Sep 2021 DLHC010292962021

    … within thirty (30) days and has thereby, violated the terms of clause 1.12.4. and also alleged that the Directors of the petitioner had been disqualified by the Registrar of Companies Patna from 01.12.2017 to 30.11.2022 under Section164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 resulting in their offices becoming vacant under Section 167 of the Companies Act and since the bid was submitted by Mr. Kalyan Kumar Singh, Director, his position as Director in AICPL stood void ab-initio and that the bid was won under fraudulent practices as defined under Clause 2(c) of' Instructions to Bidders'. Again on 14.12.2020, the respondent issued a Termination …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 05 Jan 2021 KLHC010479712020

    … The learned counsel for the petitioner urged that Section 164(2)(a) disqualifies a person as Director if financial statements or annual returns are not filed for a continuous period of three years. Such Directors cannot be reappointed for a period of five years. Section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates that the office of a Director shall become vacant in case he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in Section 164. In view of the continued default in filing the mandatory returns, respondents 3 to 7 should be deemed to have vacated office of the Directors by operation of …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 20 Apr 2018 KLHC010456222018

    … Due to the non filing of the return and other statutory stipulations, disqualification is applied to the petitioners as per Section 164 r/w Section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013. While so, the Central Government has launched a scheme in order to settle the action initiated against the company, which was valid up to 31.03.2018 and stands extended to 30.04.2018. Petitioners want to take advantage of the scheme launched by the Central Government, rectifying the …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

4 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 167

What have the courts held on Section 167 of the Companies Act?

Sanjeev Kumar Saboo vs Union of India (16 Jun 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Vacation of office of director upon disqualification.

How do I find court cases under Section 167 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 167, section 167 Companies Act, section 167 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 167m and companies act 2006 section 167. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Sanjeev Kumar Saboo vs Union of India (16 Jun 2021).

What should I read with Section 167 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 164 (Disqualifications for appointment of director), section 184 (Disclosure of interest by director), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. 4 instruments name it without being made under it, most recently Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 (2018), then Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018 (2017).

When did Section 167 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 167 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 167, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.