Section237
The Companies Act, 2013

Power of Central Government to provide for amalgamation of companies in public interest

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Instruments 1

Section 237 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with power of Central Government to provide for amalgamation of companies in public interest. Where the Central Government is satisfied that it is essential in the public interest that two or more companies should amalgamate, the Central Government may, by order notified in the Official Gazette, provide for the amalgamation of those companies into a single company with such constitution, wit The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) Where the Central Government is satisfied that it is essential in the public interest that two or more companies should amalgamate, the Central Government may, by order notified in the Official Gazette, provide for the amalgamation of those companies into a single company with such constitution, with such property, powers, rights, interests, authorities and privileges, and with such liabilities, duties and obligations, as may be specified in the order.

(2) The order under sub-section (1) may also provide for the continuation by or against the transferee company of any legal proceedings pending by or against any transferor company and such consequential, incidental and supplemental provisions as may, in the opinion of the Central Government, be necessary to give effect to the amalgamation.

(3) Every member or creditor, including a debenture holder, of each of the transferor companies before the amalgamation shall have, as nearly as may be, the same interest in or rights against the transferee company as he had in the company of which he was originally a member or creditor, and in case the interest or rights of such member or creditor in or against the transferee company are less than his interest in or rights against the original company, he shall be entitled to compensation to that extent, which shall be assessed by such authority as may be prescribed and every such assessment shall be published in the Official Gazette, and the compensation so assessed shall be paid to the member or creditor concerned by the transferee company.

(4) Any person aggrieved by any assessment of compensation made by the prescribed authority under sub-section (3) may, within a period of thirty days from the date of publication of such assessment in the Official Gazette, prefer an appeal to the Tribunal and thereupon the assessment of the compensation shall be made by the Tribunal.

(5) No order shall be made under this section unless--

(a) a copy of the proposed order has been sent in draft to each of the companies concerned;

(b) the time for preferring an appeal under sub-section (4) has expired, or where any such appeal has been preferred, the appeal has been finally disposed off; and

(c) the Central Government has considered, and made such modifications, if any, in the draft order as it may deem fit in the light of suggestions and objections which may be received by it from any such company within such period as the Central Government may fix in that behalf, not being less than two months from the date on which the copy aforesaid is received by that company, or from any class of shareholders therein, or from any creditors or any class of creditors thereof.

(6) The copies of every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it has been made, be laid before each House of Parliament.

Section 237, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (formerly FTIL) & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

    High Court 04 Dec 2017 Persuasive (High Court) WP 2743/2014 & connected — Final Order / Judgment pronounced 04.12.2017 (Bombay HC — Chief Justice & M.S. Sonak J.)

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    Final Order order-43.pdf: body records DATE OF PRONOUNCING THE JUDGMENT : 04 DECEMBER 2017 (matches order index; VERIFY banner false-positive from earlier interim dates in dossier). Bombay HC dismissed FTIL/63 Moons challenges and upheld Central Government compulsory amalgamation of NSEL into FTIL under Cos 1956 s.396 after intensive review/proportionality analysis. Map to empty Cos 2013 s.237 (CG power to amalgamate in public interest). Note: SC later reversed the amalgamation order in connected appeals whose judgement PDF remained wrong-doc/ROP-cache — teach this HC isolate as the labelled Final Order text available.

    On this section: s.237 Power of Central Government to provide for amalgamation of companies in public interest — corresponding teaching from 1956 s.396 NSEL/FTIL amalgamation challenge.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. High Court 03 Mar 2020 KLHC010112942012

    … M/s.Vysakh Internation Hotels Pvt. Ltd., and also illegal/fraudulent appointment of respondents 2 and 3 as its Directors. Additionally, they sought for a consequential relief of rectification of shares under Section 111(4) of the Companies Act and investigation into the affairs of the company under Section 237 of the Companies Act. In CP No.89/2010, the respondents herein filed CA No.208/2010. In fact, the said CA was filed by respondents 1, 6, 7 and 9, seeking for the dismissal of CP No.89/2010 on the ground that it is not maintainable inasmuch as the petitioners therein/appellants herein do not hold any shares in the …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

1 instrument names this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 237

What have the courts held on Section 237 of the Companies Act?

63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (formerly FTIL) & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (04 Dec 2017) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.237 Power of Central Government to provide for amalgamation of companies in public interest — corresponding teaching from 1956 s.396 NSEL/FTIL amalgamation challenge.

How do I find court cases under Section 237 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 237, section 237 Companies Act, section 237 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type 237 companies act 1956. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (formerly FTIL) & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (04 Dec 2017).

What should I read with Section 237 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

One instrument names it without being made under it, most recently G.S.R. 207(E)-Amendment to Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013 (2021).

When did Section 237 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 237 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 237, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.