Power of Registrar to remove name of company from register of companies
Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with power of Registrar to remove name of company from register of companies. Where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that-- (a) a company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation; The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.
(1) Where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that--
(a) a company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation; 1[or]
2* * * * *
(c) a company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under 3[section 455; or]
4[(d) the subscribers to the memorandum have not paid the subscription which they had undertaken to pay at the time of incorporation of a company and a declaration to this effect has not been filed within one hundred and eighty days of its incorporation under sub-section (1) of section 10A; or
(e) the company is not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification carried out under sub-section (9) of section 12.]
he shall send a notice to the company and all the directors of the company, of his intention to remove the name of the company from the register of companies and requesting them to send their representations along with copies of the relevant documents, if any, within a period of thirty days from the date of the notice.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), a company may, after extinguishing all its liabilities, by a special resolution or consent of seventy-five per cent. members in terms of paid-up share capital, file an application in the prescribed manner to the Registrar for removing the name of the company from the register of companies on all or any of the grounds specified in sub-section (1) and the Registrar shall, on receipt of such application, cause a public notice to be issued in the prescribed manner:
Provided that in the case of a company regulated under a special Act, approval of the regulatory body constituted or established under that Act shall also be obtained and enclosed with the application.
(3) Nothing in sub-section (2) shall apply to a company registered under section 8.
(4) A notice issued under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be published in the prescribed manner and also in the Official Gazette for the information of the general public.
(5) At the expiry of the time mentioned in the notice, the Registrar may, unless cause to the contrary is shown by the company, strike off its name from the register of companies, and shall publish notice thereof in the Official Gazette, and on the publication in the Official Gazette of this notice, the company shall stand dissolved.
(6) The Registrar, before passing an order under sub-section (5), shall satisfy himself that sufficient provision has been made for the realisation of all amount due to the company and for the payment or discharge of its liabilities and obligations by the company within a reasonable time and, if necessary, obtain necessary undertakings from the managing director, director or other persons in charge of the management of the company:
Provided that notwithstanding the undertakings referred to in this sub-section, the assets of the company shall be made available for the payment or discharge of all its liabilities and obligations even after the date of the order removing the name of the company from the register of companies.
(7) The liability, if any, of every director, manager or other officer who was exercising any power of management, and of every member of the company dissolved under sub-section (5), shall continue and may be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved.
(8) Nothing in this section shall affect the power of the Tribunal to wind up a company the name of which has been struck off from the register of companies.
Section 248, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
This section refers to
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Nanki Lakhwinder Singh v. Union of India
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
Where a director has filed Form STK-2 for voluntary striking off under s.248 and is in active correspondence with the RoC on compliance, disqualification and cancellation of DIN/DSC without an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice; the disqualification list entry is set aside with liberty to the RoC to pass a fresh order after hearing.
On this section: s.248 voluntary striking-off (Form STK-2) is the compliance path the Court treats as material when reviewing RoC disqualification concurrent with strike-off correspondence.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… and it declares that even where a Company is dissolved in consequence to it being struck off under Section 248, it shall be deemed to continue to be in existence for the purpose of discharging its liabilities. The said section recognizes the continuing liability of a struck off company, which is in addition to Section 248(7) of the Companies Act, 2013, which reads as under: > " 248. Power of Registrar to remove name of company from register of companies. – (1) XXX XXX XXX > (7) The liability, if any, of every director, manager or other officer who was exercising any power of management, and of every members of the company …
-
… (Appointments and Qualifications of Directors) Rules, 2014 ,are not liable to be deactivated or cancelled solely for the reason that the petitioners stand disqualified for appointment / reappointment as Directors of Companies by operation of Section 164(2). G. Striking off and Disqualification 72. Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Registrar of Companies to strike off the name of a Company from the Register of Companies if the Company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of immediately preceding two financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the …
-
… (Appointments and Qualifications of Directors) Rules, 2014 ,are not liable to be deactivated or cancelled solely for the reason that the petitioners stand disqualified for appointment / reappointment as Directors of Companies by operation of Section 164(2). G. Striking off and Disqualification 72. Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Registrar of Companies to strike off the name of a Company from the Register of Companies if the Company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of immediately preceding two financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the …
Made under this section, and citing it
8 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.
- G.S.R 298(E) Companies Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies Amendment Rules 2023 dated 17.04.2023Rule 2023
- G.S.R. 354(E) Companies Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies Second Amendment Rules 2023 dated 10.05.2023Rule 2023
- G.S.R 658(E) The Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Second Amendment Rules, 2022 dated 24.08.2022Rule 2022
- G.S.R NO. 436(E) Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2022 dated 09.06.2022Rule 2022
- companies(removal of names of register of co;s) Amdt rules 2020Rule 2020
- Companies(Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2019Rule 2019
- Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Amendment Rules, 2017Rule 2017
- Companies (Removal of names of companies from the Register of Companies) Rules 2016Rule 2016
Another 9 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
- Notificatiion- Commencment of sections 248 to 252 of Companies Act, 2013Notification 2016
- G.S.R 643(E) companies Incorporation Third Amendment Rules 2022 dated 18.08.2022Rule 2022
- G.S.R. 207(E)-Amendment to Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013Rule 2021
- Companies Incorporation Fifth Amendment Rules,2019Rule 2019
- Clarification-Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018Circular 2018
- Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Third Amendment Rules, 2018Rule 2018
- Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018Circular 2018
- Condonation of Delay Scheme 2018Circular 2017
- Chapter II - The Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014Rule 2014
Questions about Section 248
What have the courts held on Section 248 of the Companies Act?
Nanki Lakhwinder Singh v. Union of India (07 May 2019) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: s.248 voluntary striking-off (Form STK-2) is the compliance path the Court treats as material when reviewing RoC disqualification concurrent with strike-off correspondence.
How do I find court cases under Section 248 of the Companies Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 248, section 248 Companies Act, section 248 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 248 2 and companies act 2006 section 248. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Nanki Lakhwinder Singh v. Union of India (07 May 2019).
What should I read with Section 248 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?
Its own text turns on section 8 (Formation of companies with charitable objects, etc), section 10A (Commencement of business, etc), section 12 (Registered office of company), section 455 (Dormant company), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 5 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 8: most recently G.S.R 298(E) Companies Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies Amendment Rules 2023 dated 17.04.2023 (2023), then G.S.R. 354(E) Companies Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies Second Amendment Rules 2023 dated 10.05.2023 (2023), and 6 more.
When did Section 248 of the Companies Act come into force?
Section 248 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 248, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions5089 words
- 143. Powers and duties of auditors and auditing standards1867 words
- 230. Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and members1432 words
- 232. Merger and amalgamation of companies1416 words
- 149. Company to have Board of Directors1403 words
- 217. Procedure, powers, etc., of inspectors1390 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 14 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.