Section327
The Companies Act, 2013

Preferential payments

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 16 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 1 provision

Section 327 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with preferential payments. In a winding up, subject to the provisions of section 326, there shall be paid in priority to all other debts,-- (a) all revenues, taxes, cesses and rates due from the company to the Central Government or a State Government or to a local authority at the relevant date, and having become due and paya The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) In a winding up, subject to the provisions of section 326, there shall be paid in priority to all other debts,--

(a) all revenues, taxes, cesses and rates due from the company to the Central Government or a State Government or to a local authority at the relevant date, and having become due and payable within the twelve months immediately before that date;

(b) all wages or salary including wages payable for time or piece work and salary earned wholly or in part by way of commission of any employee in respect of services rendered to the company and due for a period not exceeding four months within the twelve months immediately before the relevant date, subject to the condition that the amount payable under this clause to any workman shall not exceed such amount as may be notified;

(c) all accrued holiday remuneration becoming payable to any employee, or in the case of his death, to any other person claiming under him, on the termination of his employment before, or by the winding up order, or, as the case may be, the dissolution of the company;

(d) unless the company is being wound up voluntarily merely for the purposes of reconstruction or amalgamation with another company, all amount due in respect of contributions payable during the period of twelve months immediately before the relevant date by the company as the employer of persons under the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) or any other law for the time being in force;

(e) unless the company has, at the commencement of winding up, under such a contract with any insurer as is mentioned in section 14 of the Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (8 of 1923), rights capable of being transferred to and vested in the workmen, all amount due in respect of any compensation or liability for compensation under the said Act in respect of the death or disablement of any employee of the company:

Provided that where any compensation under the said Act is a weekly payment, the amount payable under this clause shall be taken to be the amount of the lump sum for which such weekly payment could, if redeemable, be redeemed, if the employer has made an application under that Act;

(f) all sums due to any employee from the provident fund, the pension fund, the gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of the employees, maintained by the company; and

(g) the expenses of any investigation held in pursuance of sections 213 and 216, in so far as they are payable by the company.

(2) Where any payment has been made to any employee of a company on account of wages or salary or accrued holiday remuneration, himself or, in the case of his death, to any other person claiming through him, out of money advanced by some person for that purpose, the person by whom the money was advanced shall, in a winding up, have a right of priority in respect of the money so advanced and paid-up to the amount by which the sum in respect of which the employee or other person in his right would have been entitled to priority in the winding up has been reduced by reason of the payment having been made.

(3) The debts enumerated in this section shall--

(a) rank equally among themselves and be paid in full, unless the assets are insufficient to meet them, in which case they shall abate in equal proportions; and

(b) so far as the assets of the company available for payment to general creditors are insufficient to meet them, have priority over the claims of holders of debentures under any floating charge created by the company, and be paid accordingly out of any property comprised in or subject to that charge.

(4) Subject to the retention of such sums as may be necessary for the costs and expenses of the winding up, the debts under this section shall be discharged forthwith so far as the assets are sufficient to meet them, and in the case of the debts to which priority is given under clause (d) of sub-section (1), formal proof thereof shall not be required except in so far as may be otherwise prescribed.

(5) In the event of a landlord or other person distraining or having distrained on any goods or effects of the company within three months immediately before the date of a winding up order, the debts to which priority is given under this section shall be a first charge on the goods or effects so distrained on or the proceeds of the sale thereof:

Provided that, in respect of any money paid under any such charge, the landlord or other person shall have the same rights of priority as the person to whom the payment is made.

(6) Any remuneration in respect of a period of holiday or of absence from work on medical grounds through sickness or other good cause shall be deemed to be wages in respect of services rendered to the company during that period.

1[(7) Sections 326 and 327 shall not be applicable in the event of liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016).]

Explanation.-- For the purposes of this section,--

(a) the expression accrued holiday remuneration includes, in relation to any person, all sums which, by virtue either of his contract of employment or of any enactment including any order made or direction given thereunder, are payable on account of the remuneration which would, in the ordinary course, have become payable to him in respect of a period of holiday, had his employment with the company continued until he became entitled to be allowed the holiday;

(b) the expression employee does not include a workman; and

2[(c) the expression relevant date means in the case of a company being wound up by the Tribunal, the date of appointment or first appointment of a provisional liquidator, or if no such appointment was made, the date of the winding up order, unless, in either case, the company had commenced to be wound up voluntarily before that date under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016).]

Section 327, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma vs Union of India

    Supreme Court of India 02 May 2023 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable (2023) 5 SCC 1

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 represents an organic evolution of insolvency law through a consultative process involving multiple committees and expert bodies. The waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of IBC, which ranks workmen's dues for 24 months preceding liquidation commencement date pari passu with secured creditors who relinquish security, is a carefully balanced framework that adequately protects workmen's interests while promoting revival of insolvent companies and maximizing asset value for all stakeholders. This framework is not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The two regimes - liquidation under Companies Act 2013 and liquidation under IBC - deal with different situations and cannot be compared for constitutional purposes. In economic legislation, courts should defer to legislative judgment unless the exercise of legislative judgment appears to be palpably arbitrary. The sacrifices required from workmen under IBC are not manifestly unjust or arbitrary, and the exclusion of Provident Fund, Pension Fund and Gratuity Fund from liquidation estate, combined with the 24-month protection and Regulation 21A safeguards, adequately protect workmen's dues.

    On this section: Preferential payments waterfall mechanism; Section 327(7) excludes application in IBC liquidation

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. Supreme Court of India 02 May 2023 SCIN010092212020

    … However, the waterfall mechanism, as has been fully altered by the IBC will apply to these "workmen's dues" and not the waterfall mechanism contained in Section 326 of Companies Act, 2013. It is submitted that the reason for introduction of Section 327(7) of Companies Act, 2013 is only to exclude the application of waterfall mechanism and the modalities contained in the Companies Act, 2013 which has now been changed through the IBC. It is submitted that therefore, the argument that the waterfall mechanism from the Companies Act, 2013 must apply even under the IBC, …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. Supreme Court of India 02 May 2023 SCIN010111702019

    … However, the waterfall mechanism, as has been fully altered by the IBC will apply to these "workmen's dues" and not the waterfall mechanism contained in Section 326 of Companies Act, 2013. It is submitted that the reason for introduction of Section 327(7) of Companies Act, 2013 is only to exclude the application of waterfall mechanism and the modalities contained in the Companies Act, 2013 which has now been changed through the IBC. It is submitted that therefore, the argument that the waterfall mechanism from the Companies Act, 2013 must apply even under the IBC, …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. Supreme Court of India 02 May 2023 SCIN010092232020

    … However, the waterfall mechanism, as has been fully altered by the IBC will apply to these "workmen's dues" and not the waterfall mechanism contained in Section 326 of Companies Act, 2013. It is submitted that the reason for introduction of Section 327(7) of Companies Act, 2013 is only to exclude the application of waterfall mechanism and the modalities contained in the Companies Act, 2013 which has now been changed through the IBC. It is submitted that therefore, the argument that the waterfall mechanism from the Companies Act, 2013 must apply even under the IBC, …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Questions about Section 327

What have the courts held on Section 327 of the Companies Act?

Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma vs Union of India (02 May 2023) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Preferential payments waterfall mechanism; Section 327(7) excludes application in IBC liquidation.

How do I find court cases under Section 327 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 327, section 327 Companies Act, section 327 of the Companies Act. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma vs Union of India (02 May 2023).

What should I read with Section 327 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 213 (Investigation into company‘s affairs in other cases), section 216 (Investigation of ownership of company), section 326 (Overriding preferential payments), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 1 other provision in this corpus refers back to it.

When did Section 327 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 327 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 327, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 16 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.