Section420
The Companies Act, 2013

Orders of Tribunal

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 16 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014

Section 420 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with orders of Tribunal. The Tribunal may, after giving the parties to any proceeding before it, a reasonable opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit. The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) The Tribunal may, after giving the parties to any proceeding before it, a reasonable opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit.

(2) The Tribunal may, at any time within two years from the date of the order, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it, and shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice by the parties:

Provided that no such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against which an appeal has been preferred under this Act.

(3) The Tribunal shall send a copy of every order passed under this section to all the parties concerned.

Section 420, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Tata Industries Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

    Supreme Court of India 26 Mar 2021 Binding (Supreme Court) Reportable Judgment dated 26.03.2021 (SC 3J — Bobde CJI, Bopanna, Ramasubramanian JJ.) — companion cluster to (2021) 9 SCC 449

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    AoA alteration / public-to-private conversion must comply with s.14; conversion was not itself oppression under ss.241/242.

    On this section: It fixes the outer limit of the Tribunal's post-decisional power under Section 420(2), separating rectification of an apparent mistake from a substantive reconsideration of the order.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

  2. Sagufa Ahmed vs Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. LTD

    Supreme Court of India 18 Sep 2020 Binding (SC) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The period of limitation prescribed under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for filing an appeal to the NCLAT starts from the date on which a copy of the NCLT order is made available to the person aggrieved. The Supreme Court's order dated 23.03.2020 extending the period of limitation due to COVID-19 applies only to the 'prescribed period' (the period of limitation) and not to the discretionary period for condonation of delay provided in the proviso to Section 421(3). The discretionary period for condonation of delay is limited to 45 days and cannot be extended by the COVID-19 extension order. The law of limitation is based on the principle of vigilance, and litigants who fail to file proceedings within the prescribed period and the discretionary condonation period cannot claim the benefit of the COVID-19 extension order.

    On this section: Mandates the NCLT to send a copy of every order to all parties concerned; establishes the obligation to provide copies

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. Supreme Court of India 22 Oct 2021 SCIN010159542020

    … In fact, the explanation to the provision is a clear indicator of the legal position that the time which is taken by the court to prepare the decree or order cannot be excluded before the application to obtain a copy is made. It cannot be said that the right to receive a free copy under Section 420(3) of the Companies Act obviated the obligation on the appellant to seek a certified copy through an application. The appellant has urged that Rule 14<sup>24</sup> of the NCLAT Rules empowers the NCLAT to exempt parties from compliance with the requirement of any of the rules in the interests of substantial justice, …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. Supreme Court of India 18 Sep 2020 SCIN010170382020

    … as well as the order passed by this Court on 23.03.2020 in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020, extending the period of limitation for filing any proceeding with effect from 15.03.2020 until further orders. 9. Let us now test the correctness of the contentions one by one. Contention1 10. Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates the NCLT to send a copy of every order passed under Section 420(1) to all the parties concerned. Section 420(3) reads as follows: "420. Orders of Tribunal (1) xxxx (2) xxxx (3) The Tribunal shall send a copy of every order passed under this section to …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. Supreme Court of India 25 Jan 2019 SCIN010359422018

    … Application by financial creditor .— xxx xxx xxx (3) The applicant shall dispatch forthwith, a copy of the application filed with the Adjudicating Authority, by registered post or speed post to the registered office of the corporate debtor. xxx xxx xxx‖ Section 420 of the Companies Act, 2013 states as follows: ― 420. Orders of Tribunal .—(1) The Tribunal may, after giving the parties to any proceeding before it, a reasonable opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit. (2) The Tribunal may, at any time within two years from the date of the …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Questions about Section 420

What have the courts held on Section 420 of the Companies Act?

Tata Industries Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (26 Mar 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: It fixes the outer limit of the Tribunal's post-decisional power under Section 420(2), separating rectification of an apparent mistake from a substantive reconsideration of the order. Another 1 judgment on this section is set out below, all of them from the Supreme Court. They run from 2020 to 2021.

How do I find court cases under Section 420 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 420, section 420 Companies Act, section 420 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 2006 section 420. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 2 reported judgments on this section are set out on this page, beginning with Tata Industries Limited v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (26 Mar 2021).

When did Section 420 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 420 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 420, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 16 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.