Statement to be annexed to notice
Section 102 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with statement to be annexed to notice. A statement setting out the following material facts concerning each item of special business to be transacted at a general meeting, shall be annexed to the notice calling such meeting, namely:-- (a) the nature of concern or interest, financial or otherwise, if any, in respect of each items of-- (i) The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.
(1) A statement setting out the following material facts concerning each item of special business to be transacted at a general meeting, shall be annexed to the notice calling such meeting, namely:--
(a) the nature of concern or interest, financial or otherwise, if any, in respect of each items of--
(i) every director and the manager, if any;
(ii) every other key managerial personnel; and
(iii) relatives of the persons mentioned in sub-clauses (i) and (ii);
(b) any other information and facts that may enable members to understand the meaning, scope and implications of the items of business and to take decision thereon.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1),--
(a) in the case of an annual general meeting, all business to be transacted thereat shall be deemed special, other than--
(i) the consideration of financial statements and the reports of the Board of Directors and auditors;
(ii) the declaration of any dividend;
(iii) the appointment of directors in place of those retiring;
(iv) the appointment of, and the fixing of the remuneration of, the auditors; and
(b) in the case of any other meeting, all business shall be deemed to be special:
Provided that where any item of special business to be transacted at a meeting of the company relates to or affects any other company, the extent of shareholding interest in that other company of every promoter, director, manager, if any, and of every other key managerial personnel of the first mentioned company shall, if the extent of such shareholding is not less than two per cent. of the paid-up share capital of that company, also be set out in the statement.
(3) Where any item of business refers to any document, which is to be considered at the meeting, the time and place where such document can be inspected shall be specified in the statement under sub-section (1).
(4) Where as a result of the non-disclosure or insufficient disclosure in any statement referred to in sub-section (1), being made by a promoter, director, manager, if any, or other key managerial personnel, any benefit which accrues to such promoter, director, manager or other key managerial personnel or their relatives, either directly or indirectly, the promoter, director, manager or other key managerial personnel, as the case may be, shall hold such benefit in trust for the company, and shall, without prejudice to any other action being taken against him under this Act or under any other law for the time being in force, be liable to compensate the company to the extent of the benefit received by him.
1[(5) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (4), if any default is made in complying with the provisions of this section, every promoter, director, manager or other key managerial personnel of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees or five times the amount of benefit accruing to the promoter, director, manager or other key managerial personnel or any of his relatives, whichever is higher.]
Section 102, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).
Cross-references
Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.
Related judgements & precedents
These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.
-
Ratan N. Tata & Ors. v. Nusli N. Wadia & Ors.
Court's Decision & Legal Precedent
DATE VERIFIED Final Order 22.07.2019 (order-6.pdf): Bombay HC examined Tata Sons special notice under Cos s.169(2) r/w s.115 seeking removal of independent director Nusli Wadia; analysed statutory power and procedure for shareholder removal of directors under s.169 including representation rights under s.169(4). Teaching isolate on Cos 169 removal mechanism in a famous board-governance dispute.
On this section: Treats the Section 102 statement as the statutorily mandated vehicle for disclosing the material facts and reasons behind an item of special business (here, the removal of a director), so that what a company is obliged to state in it cannot found a criminal defamation prosecution against its directors.
The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.
Judgments citing this section
These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.
-
… the Company." "RESOLVED FURTHER THAT any Director of the Company or Sri Tapan K.Basak, Company Secretary be and is hereby authorized severally to file the necessary Forms with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in respect of the resignation of Sri Bikash Mukherjee." "Explanatory Statement pursuant to Section 102 of the Companies Act, 2013 "Item No.1 The shareholders may please note that Sri Ujjal Kumar Upadhaya has resigned from the post of Chairman and Managing Director of the Company with effect from 25.07.2022 and that vide another letter dated 22.07.2022 Sri Upadhaya has desired to relinquish his position …
-
… the petitioner has made identical allegations as levelled in the present petition, the present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuing orders to the respondent no.1 namely Union of India to take necessary action against the Board of Directors under provisions to Section 102 of the Companies Act, 2013. However, the petitioner has prayed to revoke the license granted to the respondent-Club as also directions to the Registrar, NCLT to constitute a permanent Bench at Jaipur and ensure sitting of both the Members together while hearing the matter. The petitioner is a Ex-President of the …
-
… A conjoint reading of all the said provisions would thus disclose that whereas any Special Notice is required of any resolution, then it would be imperative to give to the Company, a notice of the intention to move such requisition. Section 102 of the Companies Act prescribe that if a special business is to be transacted in any meeting, it should be accompanied with a statement setting out the material facts in form of information and such facts that may enable the members to understand the meaning, scope and implication of the items of the business and to …
Made under this section, and citing it
2 instruments state that it was made under this provision — the power to make it comes from here, so a change to any of them changes what this section requires in practice. Newest first.
Another 5 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.
- G.S.R. NO. 41(E) Companies Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel Amendment Rules 2023 dated 19.01.2023Rule 2023
- G.S.R. NO. 44(E) companies (Management and Administration) amendment rules 2023 dated 21.01.2023Rule 2023
- Companies (appointment and remuneration of managerial personnel) Amendment Rules 2018Rule 2018
- Chapter IV - The Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014Rule 2014
- Clarification on the notification dated 12.9.2013.Circular 2013
Questions about Section 102
What have the courts held on Section 102 of the Companies Act?
Ratan N. Tata & Ors. v. Nusli N. Wadia & Ors. (22 Jul 2019) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Treats the Section 102 statement as the statutorily mandated vehicle for disclosing the material facts and reasons behind an item of special business (here, the removal of a director), so that what a company is obliged to state in it cannot found a criminal defamation prosecution against its directors.
How do I find court cases under Section 102 of the Companies Act?
In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 102, section 102 Companies Act, section 102 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies act 2013 section 102. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Ratan N. Tata & Ors. v. Nusli N. Wadia & Ors. (22 Jul 2019).
What should I read with Section 102 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?
2 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. The rules and notifications made under it are where it actually bites, and there are 2: most recently The Companies (Management and Administration) Amendment Rules, 2014 (2014), then The Companies (Management and Administration) Second Amendment Rules, 2014 (2014).
When did Section 102 of the Companies Act come into force?
Section 102 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 102, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.
Other sections of this Act
- 2. Definitions5089 words
- 143. Powers and duties of auditors and auditing standards1867 words
- 230. Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and members1432 words
- 232. Merger and amalgamation of companies1416 words
- 149. Company to have Board of Directors1403 words
- 217. Procedure, powers, etc., of inspectors1390 words
Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.