Section465
The Companies Act, 2013

Repeal of certain enactments and savings

In force From 01 Apr 2014 Act 18 of 2013 As on 15 Oct 2026

Act 18 of 2013 Ministry Corporate Affairs Enacted 29 Aug 2013 In force 01 Apr 2014 Cited by 3 provisions Instruments 4

Section 465 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with repeal of certain enactments and savings. The Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and the Registration of Companies (Sikkim) Act, 1961 (Sikkim Act 8 of 1961) (hereafter in this section referred to as the repealed enactments) shall stand repealed: Provided that the provisions of Part IX A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) shall be applicabl The Act came into force on 01 Apr 2014.

(1) The Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and the Registration of Companies (Sikkim) Act, 1961 (Sikkim Act 8 of 1961) (hereafter in this section referred to as the repealed enactments) shall stand repealed:

Provided that the provisions of Part IX A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) shall be applicable mutatis mutandis to a Producer Company in a manner as if the Companies Act, 1956 has not been repealed until a special Act is enacted for Producer Companies:

Provided further that until a date is notified by the Central Government under subsection (1) of Section 434 for transfer of all matters, proceedings or cases to the Tribunal, the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) in regard to the jurisdiction, powers, authority and functions of the Board of Company Law Administration and court shall continue to apply as if the Companies Act, 1956 has not been repealed:

Provided also that provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) referred in the notification issued under section 67 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009) shall, until the relevant notification under such section applying relevant corresponding provisions of this Act to limited liability partnerships is issued, continue to apply as if the Companies Act, 1956 has not been repealed.

(2) Notwithstanding the repeal under sub-section (1) of the repealed enactments,--

(a) anything done or any action taken or purported to have been done or taken, including any rule, notification, inspection, order or notice made or issued or any appointment or declaration made or any operation undertaken or any direction given or any proceeding taken or any penalty, punishment, forfeiture or fine imposed under the repealed enactments shall, insofar as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act;

(b) subject to the provisions of clause (a), any order, rule, notification, regulation, appointment, conveyance, mortgage, deed, document or agreement made, fee directed, resolution passed, direction given, proceeding taken, instrument executed or issued, or thing done under or in pursuance of any repealed enactment shall, if in force at the commencement of this Act, continue to be in force, and shall have effect as if made, directed, passed, given, taken, executed, issued or done under or in pursuance of this Act;

(c) any principle or rule of law, or established jurisdiction, form or course of pleading, practice or procedure or existing usage, custom, privilege, restriction or exemption shall not be affected, notwithstanding that the same respectively may have been in any manner affirmed or recognised or derived by, in, or from, the repealed enactments;

(d) any person appointed to any office under or by virtue of any repealed enactment shall be deemed to have been appointed to that office under or by virtue of this Act;

(e) any jurisdiction, custom, liability, right, title, privilege, restriction, exemption, usage, practice, procedure or other matter or thing not in existence or in force shall not be revised or restored;

(f) the offices existing on the commencement of this Act for the registration of companies shall continue as if they have been established under the provisions of this Act;

(g) the incorporation of companies registered under the repealed enactments shall continue to be valid and the provisions of this Act shall apply to such companies as if they were registered under this Act;

(h) all registers and all funds constituted and established under the repealed enactments shall be deemed to be registers and funds constituted or established under the corresponding provisions of this Act;

(i) any prosecution instituted under the repealed enactments and pending immediately before the commencement of this Act before any Court shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, continue to be heard and disposed of by the said Court;

(j) any inspection, investigation or inquiry ordered to be done under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) shall continue to be proceeded with as if such inspection, investigation or inquiry has been ordered under the corresponding provisions of this Act; and

(k) any matter filed with the Registrar, Regional Director or the Central Government under the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) before the commencement of this Act and not fully addressed at that time shall be concluded by the Registrar, Regional Director or the Central Government, as the case may be, in terms of that Act, despite its repeal.

(3) The mention of particular matters in sub-section (2) shall not be held to prejudice the general application of section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897) with regard to the effect of repeal of the repealed enactments as if the Registration of Companies (Sikkim) Act, 1961 (Sikkim Act 8 of 1961) were also a Central Act.

Section 465, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013).

Cross-references

Extracted from the operative text of the enactments themselves. Every destination below exists in our corpus.

Related judgements & precedents

These are some judgments that construed this section, and hold precedence value. They hold authority on how to read, interpret and use this section.

  1. Tata Industries Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt. LTD

    Supreme Court of India 26 Mar 2021 Binding (SC) Reportable

    Court's Decision & Legal Precedent

    The removal of a Director from office, even if carried out in a manner that may be questioned on procedural grounds, cannot be termed as oppressive or prejudicial conduct under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, unless it is part of a larger design to oppress or prejudice the interests of some members. The invocation of the 'just and equitable' clause for winding up requires either a functional deadlock or an irretrievable breakdown of trust and confidence in a quasi-partnership relationship. The affirmative voting rights of Directors nominated by institutional shareholders holding majority stakes are valid and do not constitute oppressive conduct. The Tribunal cannot grant reliefs not sought by the petitioners or not permitted under law, including reinstatement of a director after the expiry of his tenure. The conversion of a company from public to private status is valid if the company satisfies the statutory criteria for being classified as a private company, and the Tribunal cannot interfere with such conversion on the ground of lack of probity without establishing actual oppressive or prejudicial conduct.

    On this section: Repeal of Companies Act, 1956. The Court examined the implications of the repeal and the transitional provisions for determining the status of companies.

    Read the full order on eCourts India

The holding above is the ratio decidendi as extracted from the judgment by eCourts India, reproduced unaltered — it is a rendering of the court's reasoning, not a substitute for its words. Read the order itself before relying on it.

Judgments citing this section

These may be obiter dicta or a precedent, for you to study. These are the judgments where this section is quoted.

  1. Supreme Court of India 26 Mar 2021 SCIN010063202020

    … The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Subsection (2) of Section 465 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides a list of matters which will stand saved despite the repeal of the 1956 Act. Subsection (3) of Section 465 makes it clear that the mention of particular matters in Subsection (2) shall not be held to prejudice the general application of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  2. High Court 25 Jul 2024 WBCHCA0047622021

    … It is the case of the petitioners that the respondent SEBI initiated the said criminal proceeding being Complaint Case No. SEBI 10 of 2017, as against the Petitioners by submitting a complaint by mechanically incorporating Sections 56, 60 and 70 read with Section 2(36), 73 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Section 465 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the SEBI (Discloser and Investors Protection) Guidelines 2000 read with SEBI (Issue of Capital and Discloser Requirement) Regulations 2009. The aforesaid offences are punishable under Section 24 and 27 of the SEBI Act 1992 and also offences under Section 26A, 26B, 26C of the SEBI Act …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

  3. High Court 08 Dec 2023 KAHC020007432015

    … or shop-cum-godown, in the market yard shall be allotted either on lease-cum-sale basis or leave and license basis to a person or an institution or organization, Farmer-Producer Organization registered under Section 581-A of the Companies Act, 1956 (Central Act 1 of 1956) or under first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 465 of the Companies Act, 2013 who is not a licensed market functionary and who is a defaulter in payment of any dues either to the Seller or to the Market Committee and not engaged either in the marketing of notified agricultural produces or the allied activities connected with Agriculture, Horticulture or Animal …

    Read this order on eCourtsIndia

Made under this section, and citing it

4 instruments name this provision in its title or its text without being made under it.

All subordinate legislation

Questions about Section 465

What have the courts held on Section 465 of the Companies Act?

Tata Industries Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt. LTD (26 Mar 2021) is the leading judgment on this section among those set out below: Repeal of Companies Act, 1956. The Court examined the implications of the repeal and the transitional provisions for determining the status of companies.

How do I find court cases under Section 465 of the Companies Act?

In judgments and charge sheets this section is written several ways, and each form finds a different set of orders. These search the full text of every order eCourtsIndia holds, best matches first: Companies Act 465, section 465 Companies Act, section 465 of the Companies Act. People searching for it also type companies ordinance 465. Each opens the full list of orders on eCourtsIndia, where it can be narrowed by court, year and outcome. 1 reported judgment on this section is set out on this page, beginning with Tata Industries Limited vs Cyrus Investments Pvt. LTD (26 Mar 2021).

What should I read with Section 465 of the Companies Act, and has it changed?

Its own text turns on section 434 (Transfer of certain pending proceedings), General Clauses Act 6 (Effect of repeal), Limited Liability Partnership Act 67 (Application of the provisions of the Companies Act), so none of them can safely be read on its own. 3 other provisions in this corpus refer back to it. 4 instruments name it without being made under it, most recently Notification under section 465 of CA 2013 (2019), then Notification under section 465 of CA 2013 (2019).

When did Section 465 of the Companies Act come into force?

Section 465 of the Companies Act, cited as Companies Act 465, came into force on 01 Apr 2014, having been enacted on 29 Aug 2013. It is in force as at the date shown on this page.

Other sections of this Act

Source and method. Compiled from the enactments of Parliament and of the State legislatures as published on India Code, and republished together with commentary and other original matter under section 52(1)(q)(ii) of the Copyright Act, 1957. Structured, cross-referenced and maintained by eCourtsIndia. Text as in force on 15 Oct 2026. This page is not a substitute for legal advice.